B1

빵집 폐기물 줄이기

단원 소개

빵집 폐기물 줄이기 · B1. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 실제 단서를 연결하되 근거 없는 사실을 더하지 마세요.

직접 작성한 영어 자료를 읽고 근거를 찾아 답하세요. 수준 표기는 편집상의 안내이며 인증 결과가 아닙니다.

12 문항
저장하면 내 컬렉션에서 다시 볼 수 있어요.
Reducing waste at a bakery — context illustration
읽기B1

Reducing waste at a bakery

직접 작성한 영어 자료를 읽고 근거를 찾아 답하세요. 수준 표기는 편집상의 안내이며 인증 결과가 아닙니다.

To the team,

During last month’s stock review, we found that we were counting unsold loaves but not the damaged packaging we threw away each day. From Monday, we will record both. This will give us a clearer picture of where waste occurs, rather than assuming that every problem starts with making too much bread.

For two weeks, deliveries to the three cafes on North Road will use returnable plastic crates instead of single-use cardboard boxes. The crates are already owned by the bakery, so we do not need to buy more for this trial. Delivery staff must count them at each stop. Cafe staff will leave empty crates ready for collection the next morning. Please do not stack full crates above the marked line in the van; the lower loaves can be damaged by too much weight.

We considered asking all home-delivery customers to return packaging as well. For now, that would add too much time to the route. We will review the cafe trial before changing home deliveries. A successful result for three regular business stops would not automatically mean the same system works for dozens of separate homes.

At the shop, slices left from sandwich preparation will be set aside for our usual food partner, but only if they meet the existing food-handling rules. This is not permission to keep food for longer than we normally allow. Any uncertainty should go to the shift supervisor, not be settled by guessing that a donation is better than disposal.

At the end of the trial, we will compare damaged packaging, missing crates and the extra minutes spent collecting them. We will also ask the cafe staff whether storing the empties caused problems. Lower rubbish totals are important, but the system must be safe and manageable for the people using it. Please bring suggestions to Friday’s meeting, including anything that makes recording the information difficult.

Marta, manager

핵심 먼저 확인하기

명시된 세부 정보 · 단서에 근거한 추론

질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 실제 단서를 연결하되 근거 없는 사실을 더하지 마세요.

The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.

이유 · 명시된 세부 정보

실제로 제시된 이유를 찾으세요. 글 밖의 그럴듯한 이유만으로는 부족합니다. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.

We meet inside because it is raining.

근거의 한계 · 관점과 평가

근거가 있는 주장과 아직 모르는 것을 나누세요. 언급이 없다고 없다는 증거는 아닙니다. 평가와 유보 표현을 보세요. 긍정적인 사실만으로 무조건 찬성한다고 볼 수 없습니다.

The notice gives a price, but says nothing about delivery.

학습 자료
Reducing waste at a bakery — context illustration
읽기B1

Reducing waste at a bakery

직접 작성한 영어 자료를 읽고 근거를 찾아 답하세요. 수준 표기는 편집상의 안내이며 인증 결과가 아닙니다.

To the team,

During last month’s stock review, we found that we were counting unsold loaves but not the damaged packaging we threw away each day. From Monday, we will record both. This will give us a clearer picture of where waste occurs, rather than assuming that every problem starts with making too much bread.

For two weeks, deliveries to the three cafes on North Road will use returnable plastic crates instead of single-use cardboard boxes. The crates are already owned by the bakery, so we do not need to buy more for this trial. Delivery staff must count them at each stop. Cafe staff will leave empty crates ready for collection the next morning. Please do not stack full crates above the marked line in the van; the lower loaves can be damaged by too much weight.

We considered asking all home-delivery customers to return packaging as well. For now, that would add too much time to the route. We will review the cafe trial before changing home deliveries. A successful result for three regular business stops would not automatically mean the same system works for dozens of separate homes.

At the shop, slices left from sandwich preparation will be set aside for our usual food partner, but only if they meet the existing food-handling rules. This is not permission to keep food for longer than we normally allow. Any uncertainty should go to the shift supervisor, not be settled by guessing that a donation is better than disposal.

At the end of the trial, we will compare damaged packaging, missing crates and the extra minutes spent collecting them. We will also ask the cafe staff whether storing the empties caused problems. Lower rubbish totals are important, but the system must be safe and manageable for the people using it. Please bring suggestions to Friday’s meeting, including anything that makes recording the information difficult.

Marta, manager

0/12
문제
01 / 12D01저장하면 내 컬렉션에서 다시 볼 수 있어요.

Reducing waste at a bakery

Why is buying new crates unnecessary for the trial?

내 답
1 / 12

학습 경로

01
단계 1 · 워밍업

워밍업

0/3
02
단계 2 · 실력 다지기

명시된 세부 정보 · 단서에 근거한 추론

0/1

질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 실제 단서를 연결하되 근거 없는 사실을 더하지 마세요.

The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
03
단계 3 · 실력 다지기

이유 · 명시된 세부 정보

0/2

실제로 제시된 이유를 찾으세요. 글 밖의 그럴듯한 이유만으로는 부족합니다. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.

We meet inside because it is raining.
04
단계 4 · 실력 다지기

근거의 한계 · 관점과 평가

0/1

근거가 있는 주장과 아직 모르는 것을 나누세요. 언급이 없다고 없다는 증거는 아닙니다. 평가와 유보 표현을 보세요. 긍정적인 사실만으로 무조건 찬성한다고 볼 수 없습니다.

The notice gives a price, but says nothing about delivery.
05
단계 5 · 관련 연습

관련 연습

0/3
06
단계 6 · 자료 종합 문제

자료 종합 문제

0/2
이 단원의 복습 노트

실수를 배움으로 바꿔보세요.

첫 답을 남기고 근거를 확인한 뒤 다른 문제를 풀어 보세요. 같은 자료에서 맞혔다고 새 지문에도 적용할 수 있다는 뜻은 아니에요.

0

아직 복습 노트가 없어요. 짧은 워밍업부터 해보세요.

학습 지도

빵집 폐기물 줄이기

B1
Reducing waste at a bakery

이번 단원 핵심

01

명시된 세부 정보 · 단서에 근거한 추론

질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 실제 단서를 연결하되 근거 없는 사실을 더하지 마세요.

The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
02

이유 · 명시된 세부 정보

실제로 제시된 이유를 찾으세요. 글 밖의 그럴듯한 이유만으로는 부족합니다. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.

We meet inside because it is raining.
03

근거의 한계 · 관점과 평가

근거가 있는 주장과 아직 모르는 것을 나누세요. 언급이 없다고 없다는 증거는 아닙니다. 평가와 유보 표현을 보세요. 긍정적인 사실만으로 무조건 찬성한다고 볼 수 없습니다.

The notice gives a price, but says nothing about delivery.

문제와 정답

정답을 열면 해당 문제에 도움 사용이 기록돼요.

D01 · 워밍업

Reducing waste at a bakery

Why is buying new crates unnecessary for the trial?

  1. The bakery already owns them.
  2. Existing cardboard boxes can be made returnable.
  3. The delivery staff will collect the crates from home customers.
  4. Each cafe already owns the crates it will receive.
정답·해설 보기
The bakery already owns them.

정답: “The bakery already owns them.”. 근거: “The crates are already owned by the bakery”. “Each cafe already owns the crates it will receive.” 확인: 행동이나 역할을 다른 사람 또는 집단에 연결했습니다. “Existing cardboard boxes can be made returnable.” 확인: 이 행동에 대해 언급된 물건이 아닙니다.

D02 · 워밍업

Reducing waste at a bakery

What changes from Monday?

  1. The crate system will immediately include home customers.
  2. Only packaging will be recorded.
  3. Both unsold loaves and damaged packaging will be recorded.
  4. Unsold bread will stop being recorded once packaging is counted.
정답·해설 보기
Both unsold loaves and damaged packaging will be recorded.

정답: “Both unsold loaves and damaged packaging will be recorded.”. 근거: “From Monday, we will record both.”. “Only packaging will be recorded.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “During last month’s stock review, we found that we were counting unsold loaves but not the damaged packaging we threw away each day.”. “Unsold bread will stop being recorded once packaging is counted.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다.

D03 · 워밍업

Reducing waste at a bakery

Which deliveries are included in the crate trial?

  1. Three cafes on North Road.
  2. All cafes that buy from the bakery.
  3. Every home delivery.
  4. Deliveries of bread slices to the usual food partner.
정답·해설 보기
Three cafes on North Road.

정답: “Three cafes on North Road.”. 근거: “deliveries to the three cafes on North Road will use returnable plastic crates”. “Deliveries of bread slices to the usual food partner.” 확인: 이 행동에 대해 언급된 물건이 아닙니다. 근거: “slices left from sandwich preparation will be set aside for our usual food partner”. “All cafes that buy from the bakery.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다.

P01 · 실력 다지기

Reducing waste at a bakery

What gap did the stock review reveal?

  1. Damaged packaging was not being counted.
  2. The bakery had counted packaging but not unsold loaves.
  3. The bakery had not recorded any kind of waste.
  4. Unsold loaves had never been recorded.
정답·해설 보기
Damaged packaging was not being counted.

정답: “Damaged packaging was not being counted.”. 근거: “we were counting unsold loaves but not the damaged packaging we threw away each day.”. “The bakery had counted packaging but not unsold loaves.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. “Unsold loaves had never been recorded.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다.

P02 · 실력 다지기

Reducing waste at a bakery

When will cafes have empty crates ready for collection?

  1. Before the delivery staff have counted them at the first stop.
  2. On the next Friday after the trial ends.
  3. The next morning.
  4. Only at the end of the two-week trial.
정답·해설 보기
The next morning.

정답: “The next morning.”. 근거: “Cafe staff will leave empty crates ready for collection the next morning.”. “Only at the end of the two-week trial.” 확인: 질문에서 묻는 시각이 아닙니다. “On the next Friday after the trial ends.” 확인: 질문에서 묻는 시각이 아닙니다.

P03 · 실력 다지기

Reducing waste at a bakery

What does the memo warn against assuming?

  1. Collection takes some time.
  2. Packaging can become damaged.
  3. A system working for three cafes must also work for many homes.
  4. Returnable crates can never work for a home-delivery customer.
정답·해설 보기
A system working for three cafes must also work for many homes.

정답: “A system working for three cafes must also work for many homes.”. 근거: “A successful result for three regular business stops would not automatically mean the same system works for dozens of separate homes.”. “Returnable crates can never work for a home-delivery customer.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다. 근거: “We will review the cafe trial before changing home deliveries.”. “Packaging can become damaged.” 확인: 이는 제시된 사실이며 메모가 경고하는 가정이 아닙니다. 근거: “the damaged packaging we threw away each day.”.

P04 · 실력 다지기

Reducing waste at a bakery

Why are home deliveries not included yet?

  1. A successful cafe trial is already enough to rule out home use.
  2. Returning packaging would add too much route time.
  3. All home customers have agreed to a later start date.
  4. The manager has already measured every home route and found them unsuitable.
정답·해설 보기
Returning packaging would add too much route time.

정답: “Returning packaging would add too much route time.”. 근거: “For now, that would add too much time to the route.”. “The manager has already measured every home route and found them unsuitable.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다. “All home customers have agreed to a later start date.” 확인: 본문에 이 정보는 없습니다. 임의로 덧붙이지 마세요.

R01 · 관련 연습

Reducing waste at a bakery

Why must full crates not be stacked too high?

  1. The marked line shows how many loaves the cafe ordered.
  2. The cafe staff cannot store empty crates.
  3. The reusable crates must not touch one another.
  4. Too much weight can damage the lower loaves.
정답·해설 보기
Too much weight can damage the lower loaves.

정답: “Too much weight can damage the lower loaves.”. 근거: “the lower loaves can be damaged by too much weight.”. “The marked line shows how many loaves the cafe ordered.” 확인: 본문에 이 정보는 없습니다. 임의로 덧붙이지 마세요. “The cafe staff cannot store empty crates.” 확인: 본문에 이 정보는 없습니다. 임의로 덧붙이지 마세요.

R02 · 관련 연습

Reducing waste at a bakery

Which rules must still be followed when bread slices are set aside for the usual food partner?

  1. A longer storage limit whenever food is donated.
  2. Using returnable crates for every food donation.
  3. The existing food-handling rules.
  4. Asking a supervisor before every donation, even with no uncertainty.
정답·해설 보기
The existing food-handling rules.

정답: “The existing food-handling rules.”. 근거: “only if they meet the existing food-handling rules.”. “A longer storage limit whenever food is donated.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “This is not permission to keep food for longer than we normally allow.”. “Asking a supervisor before every donation, even with no uncertainty.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다. 근거: “Any uncertainty should go to the shift supervisor”.

R03 · 관련 연습

Reducing waste at a bakery

Who should decide when staff are uncertain about donating food?

  1. The shift supervisor.
  2. The cafe staff storing the empty crates.
  3. Whichever delivery worker arrives first.
  4. The staff member who believes donation is always better.
정답·해설 보기
The shift supervisor.

정답: “The shift supervisor.”. 근거: “Any uncertainty should go to the shift supervisor”. “The cafe staff storing the empty crates.” 확인: 행동이나 역할을 다른 사람 또는 집단에 연결했습니다. “Whichever delivery worker arrives first.” 확인: 행동이나 역할을 다른 사람 또는 집단에 연결했습니다.

X01 · 자료 종합 문제

Reducing waste at a bakery

Besides rubbish totals, what information will be reviewed?

  1. Only whether the three cafes bought more bread.
  2. Missing crates, collection time and storage difficulties.
  3. Only the number of crates originally owned by the bakery.
  4. Only the total weight of rubbish produced.
정답·해설 보기
Missing crates, collection time and storage difficulties.

정답: “Missing crates, collection time and storage difficulties.”. 근거: “we will compare damaged packaging, missing crates and the extra minutes spent collecting them. We will also ask the cafe staff whether storing the empties caused problems.”. “Only whether the three cafes bought more bread.” 확인: 본문과 다른 기준으로 성공을 판단했습니다. “Only the number of crates originally owned by the bakery.” 확인: 본문과 다른 기준으로 성공을 판단했습니다. 근거: “The crates are already owned by the bakery”.

X02 · 자료 종합 문제

Reducing waste at a bakery

Which principle guides the manager’s decision?

  1. Waste reduction must also be safe and practical.
  2. Safety rules may be relaxed if all spare food is donated.
  3. Success at the three cafes guarantees success with home customers.
  4. Less rubbish is enough, even when handling becomes unsafe.
정답·해설 보기
Waste reduction must also be safe and practical.

정답: “Waste reduction must also be safe and practical.”. 근거: “the system must be safe and manageable for the people using it.”. “Less rubbish is enough, even when handling becomes unsafe.” 확인: 본문과 다른 기준으로 성공을 판단했습니다. “Safety rules may be relaxed if all spare food is donated.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “only if they meet the existing food-handling rules.”.