명시된 세부 정보 · 단서에 근거한 추론
질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 실제 단서를 연결하되 근거 없는 사실을 더하지 마세요.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
빵집 폐기물 줄이기 · B1. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 실제 단서를 연결하되 근거 없는 사실을 더하지 마세요.
직접 작성한 영어 자료를 읽고 근거를 찾아 답하세요. 수준 표기는 편집상의 안내이며 인증 결과가 아닙니다.
To the team,
During last month’s stock review, we found that we were counting unsold loaves but not the damaged packaging we threw away each day. From Monday, we will record both. This will give us a clearer picture of where waste occurs, rather than assuming that every problem starts with making too much bread.
For two weeks, deliveries to the three cafes on North Road will use returnable plastic crates instead of single-use cardboard boxes. The crates are already owned by the bakery, so we do not need to buy more for this trial. Delivery staff must count them at each stop. Cafe staff will leave empty crates ready for collection the next morning. Please do not stack full crates above the marked line in the van; the lower loaves can be damaged by too much weight.
We considered asking all home-delivery customers to return packaging as well. For now, that would add too much time to the route. We will review the cafe trial before changing home deliveries. A successful result for three regular business stops would not automatically mean the same system works for dozens of separate homes.
At the shop, slices left from sandwich preparation will be set aside for our usual food partner, but only if they meet the existing food-handling rules. This is not permission to keep food for longer than we normally allow. Any uncertainty should go to the shift supervisor, not be settled by guessing that a donation is better than disposal.
At the end of the trial, we will compare damaged packaging, missing crates and the extra minutes spent collecting them. We will also ask the cafe staff whether storing the empties caused problems. Lower rubbish totals are important, but the system must be safe and manageable for the people using it. Please bring suggestions to Friday’s meeting, including anything that makes recording the information difficult.
Marta, manager
질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 실제 단서를 연결하되 근거 없는 사실을 더하지 마세요.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
실제로 제시된 이유를 찾으세요. 글 밖의 그럴듯한 이유만으로는 부족합니다. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.
We meet inside because it is raining.
근거가 있는 주장과 아직 모르는 것을 나누세요. 언급이 없다고 없다는 증거는 아닙니다. 평가와 유보 표현을 보세요. 긍정적인 사실만으로 무조건 찬성한다고 볼 수 없습니다.
The notice gives a price, but says nothing about delivery.
To the team,
During last month’s stock review, we found that we were counting unsold loaves but not the damaged packaging we threw away each day. From Monday, we will record both. This will give us a clearer picture of where waste occurs, rather than assuming that every problem starts with making too much bread.
For two weeks, deliveries to the three cafes on North Road will use returnable plastic crates instead of single-use cardboard boxes. The crates are already owned by the bakery, so we do not need to buy more for this trial. Delivery staff must count them at each stop. Cafe staff will leave empty crates ready for collection the next morning. Please do not stack full crates above the marked line in the van; the lower loaves can be damaged by too much weight.
We considered asking all home-delivery customers to return packaging as well. For now, that would add too much time to the route. We will review the cafe trial before changing home deliveries. A successful result for three regular business stops would not automatically mean the same system works for dozens of separate homes.
At the shop, slices left from sandwich preparation will be set aside for our usual food partner, but only if they meet the existing food-handling rules. This is not permission to keep food for longer than we normally allow. Any uncertainty should go to the shift supervisor, not be settled by guessing that a donation is better than disposal.
At the end of the trial, we will compare damaged packaging, missing crates and the extra minutes spent collecting them. We will also ask the cafe staff whether storing the empties caused problems. Lower rubbish totals are important, but the system must be safe and manageable for the people using it. Please bring suggestions to Friday’s meeting, including anything that makes recording the information difficult.
Marta, manager
Reducing waste at a bakery
질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 실제 단서를 연결하되 근거 없는 사실을 더하지 마세요.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.실제로 제시된 이유를 찾으세요. 글 밖의 그럴듯한 이유만으로는 부족합니다. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.
We meet inside because it is raining.근거가 있는 주장과 아직 모르는 것을 나누세요. 언급이 없다고 없다는 증거는 아닙니다. 평가와 유보 표현을 보세요. 긍정적인 사실만으로 무조건 찬성한다고 볼 수 없습니다.
The notice gives a price, but says nothing about delivery.첫 답을 남기고 근거를 확인한 뒤 다른 문제를 풀어 보세요. 같은 자료에서 맞혔다고 새 지문에도 적용할 수 있다는 뜻은 아니에요.
아직 복습 노트가 없어요. 짧은 워밍업부터 해보세요.
질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 실제 단서를 연결하되 근거 없는 사실을 더하지 마세요.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.실제로 제시된 이유를 찾으세요. 글 밖의 그럴듯한 이유만으로는 부족합니다. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.
We meet inside because it is raining.근거가 있는 주장과 아직 모르는 것을 나누세요. 언급이 없다고 없다는 증거는 아닙니다. 평가와 유보 표현을 보세요. 긍정적인 사실만으로 무조건 찬성한다고 볼 수 없습니다.
The notice gives a price, but says nothing about delivery.정답을 열면 해당 문제에 도움 사용이 기록돼요.
Reducing waste at a bakery
정답: “The bakery already owns them.”. 근거: “The crates are already owned by the bakery”. “Each cafe already owns the crates it will receive.” 확인: 행동이나 역할을 다른 사람 또는 집단에 연결했습니다. “Existing cardboard boxes can be made returnable.” 확인: 이 행동에 대해 언급된 물건이 아닙니다.
Reducing waste at a bakery
정답: “Both unsold loaves and damaged packaging will be recorded.”. 근거: “From Monday, we will record both.”. “Only packaging will be recorded.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “During last month’s stock review, we found that we were counting unsold loaves but not the damaged packaging we threw away each day.”. “Unsold bread will stop being recorded once packaging is counted.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다.
Reducing waste at a bakery
정답: “Three cafes on North Road.”. 근거: “deliveries to the three cafes on North Road will use returnable plastic crates”. “Deliveries of bread slices to the usual food partner.” 확인: 이 행동에 대해 언급된 물건이 아닙니다. 근거: “slices left from sandwich preparation will be set aside for our usual food partner”. “All cafes that buy from the bakery.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다.
Reducing waste at a bakery
정답: “Damaged packaging was not being counted.”. 근거: “we were counting unsold loaves but not the damaged packaging we threw away each day.”. “The bakery had counted packaging but not unsold loaves.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. “Unsold loaves had never been recorded.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다.
Reducing waste at a bakery
정답: “The next morning.”. 근거: “Cafe staff will leave empty crates ready for collection the next morning.”. “Only at the end of the two-week trial.” 확인: 질문에서 묻는 시각이 아닙니다. “On the next Friday after the trial ends.” 확인: 질문에서 묻는 시각이 아닙니다.
Reducing waste at a bakery
정답: “A system working for three cafes must also work for many homes.”. 근거: “A successful result for three regular business stops would not automatically mean the same system works for dozens of separate homes.”. “Returnable crates can never work for a home-delivery customer.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다. 근거: “We will review the cafe trial before changing home deliveries.”. “Packaging can become damaged.” 확인: 이는 제시된 사실이며 메모가 경고하는 가정이 아닙니다. 근거: “the damaged packaging we threw away each day.”.
Reducing waste at a bakery
정답: “Returning packaging would add too much route time.”. 근거: “For now, that would add too much time to the route.”. “The manager has already measured every home route and found them unsuitable.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다. “All home customers have agreed to a later start date.” 확인: 본문에 이 정보는 없습니다. 임의로 덧붙이지 마세요.
Reducing waste at a bakery
정답: “Too much weight can damage the lower loaves.”. 근거: “the lower loaves can be damaged by too much weight.”. “The marked line shows how many loaves the cafe ordered.” 확인: 본문에 이 정보는 없습니다. 임의로 덧붙이지 마세요. “The cafe staff cannot store empty crates.” 확인: 본문에 이 정보는 없습니다. 임의로 덧붙이지 마세요.
Reducing waste at a bakery
정답: “The existing food-handling rules.”. 근거: “only if they meet the existing food-handling rules.”. “A longer storage limit whenever food is donated.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “This is not permission to keep food for longer than we normally allow.”. “Asking a supervisor before every donation, even with no uncertainty.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다. 근거: “Any uncertainty should go to the shift supervisor”.
Reducing waste at a bakery
정답: “The shift supervisor.”. 근거: “Any uncertainty should go to the shift supervisor”. “The cafe staff storing the empty crates.” 확인: 행동이나 역할을 다른 사람 또는 집단에 연결했습니다. “Whichever delivery worker arrives first.” 확인: 행동이나 역할을 다른 사람 또는 집단에 연결했습니다.
Reducing waste at a bakery
정답: “Missing crates, collection time and storage difficulties.”. 근거: “we will compare damaged packaging, missing crates and the extra minutes spent collecting them. We will also ask the cafe staff whether storing the empties caused problems.”. “Only whether the three cafes bought more bread.” 확인: 본문과 다른 기준으로 성공을 판단했습니다. “Only the number of crates originally owned by the bakery.” 확인: 본문과 다른 기준으로 성공을 판단했습니다. 근거: “The crates are already owned by the bakery”.
Reducing waste at a bakery
정답: “Waste reduction must also be safe and practical.”. 근거: “the system must be safe and manageable for the people using it.”. “Less rubbish is enough, even when handling becomes unsafe.” 확인: 본문과 다른 기준으로 성공을 판단했습니다. “Safety rules may be relaxed if all spare food is donated.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “only if they meet the existing food-handling rules.”.