명시된 세부 정보
질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
B1
환경 기사
단원 소개
환경 기사 · B1. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.
직접 작성한 영어 자료를 읽고 근거를 찾아 답하세요. 수준 표기는 편집상의 안내이며 인증 결과가 아닙니다.
8 문항
저장하면 내 컬렉션에서 다시 볼 수 있어요.
A new water refill station appeared outside Westbridge sports centre last spring. The centre hoped visitors would bring reusable bottles instead of buying drinks in disposable plastic ones. During the first month, staff counted how often the station was used, but that number alone could not show how much plastic had been saved. Some people had always brought water from home. To learn more, the centre asked visitors about their habits. Among the eighty people who answered, thirty said they had stopped buying a plastic bottle at the centre since the station opened. Others said the station simply made it easier to drink more water. The survey was voluntary, so it may not represent every visitor. There were practical difficulties too. The first tap was too high for some children. After a local parent raised the issue, the centre added a lower tap. A sign that only said “Refill here” was replaced with a picture, making the station easier to recognise. The manager describes the project as a useful step rather than a complete solution. The centre still sells bottled drinks, and the survey does not measure waste elsewhere. Next, staff plan to compare bottle sales over similar busy weeks. They hope this will give a clearer picture without claiming that one machine can solve the town’s plastic problem.
핵심 먼저 확인하기
이유 · 명시된 세부 정보
실제로 제시된 이유를 찾으세요. 글 밖의 그럴듯한 이유만으로는 부족합니다. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.
We meet inside because it is raining.
관점과 평가 · 근거의 한계
평가와 유보 표현을 보세요. 긍정적인 사실만으로 무조건 찬성한다고 볼 수 없습니다. 근거가 있는 주장과 아직 모르는 것을 나누세요. 언급이 없다고 없다는 증거는 아닙니다.
The writer likes the idea but asks for one change.
학습 자료
A new water refill station appeared outside Westbridge sports centre last spring. The centre hoped visitors would bring reusable bottles instead of buying drinks in disposable plastic ones. During the first month, staff counted how often the station was used, but that number alone could not show how much plastic had been saved. Some people had always brought water from home. To learn more, the centre asked visitors about their habits. Among the eighty people who answered, thirty said they had stopped buying a plastic bottle at the centre since the station opened. Others said the station simply made it easier to drink more water. The survey was voluntary, so it may not represent every visitor. There were practical difficulties too. The first tap was too high for some children. After a local parent raised the issue, the centre added a lower tap. A sign that only said “Refill here” was replaced with a picture, making the station easier to recognise. The manager describes the project as a useful step rather than a complete solution. The centre still sells bottled drinks, and the survey does not measure waste elsewhere. Next, staff plan to compare bottle sales over similar busy weeks. They hope this will give a clearer picture without claiming that one machine can solve the town’s plastic problem.
01 / 8D01저장하면 내 컬렉션에서 다시 볼 수 있어요.
What a refill station changed
What was the centre’s main hope for the station?
학습 경로
01
단계 1 · 워밍업
0/2워밍업
02
단계 2 · 실력 다지기
0/1명시된 세부 정보
질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.03
단계 3 · 실력 다지기
0/1관점과 평가 · 근거의 한계
평가와 유보 표현을 보세요. 긍정적인 사실만으로 무조건 찬성한다고 볼 수 없습니다. 근거가 있는 주장과 아직 모르는 것을 나누세요. 언급이 없다고 없다는 증거는 아닙니다.
The writer likes the idea but asks for one change.04
단계 4 · 관련 연습
0/2관련 연습
05
단계 5 · 자료 종합 문제
0/2자료 종합 문제
이 단원의 복습 노트
0실수를 배움으로 바꿔보세요.
첫 답을 남기고 근거를 확인한 뒤 다른 문제를 풀어 보세요. 같은 자료에서 맞혔다고 새 지문에도 적용할 수 있다는 뜻은 아니에요.
아직 복습 노트가 없어요. 짧은 워밍업부터 해보세요.
학습 지도
B1환경 기사
이번 단원 핵심
명시된 세부 정보
질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.이유 · 명시된 세부 정보
실제로 제시된 이유를 찾으세요. 글 밖의 그럴듯한 이유만으로는 부족합니다. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.
We meet inside because it is raining.관점과 평가 · 근거의 한계
평가와 유보 표현을 보세요. 긍정적인 사실만으로 무조건 찬성한다고 볼 수 없습니다. 근거가 있는 주장과 아직 모르는 것을 나누세요. 언급이 없다고 없다는 증거는 아닙니다.
The writer likes the idea but asks for one change.문제와 정답
정답을 열면 해당 문제에 도움 사용이 기록돼요.
What a refill station changed
What was the centre’s main hope for the station?
- Visitors would buy more bottled drinks.
- The centre would stop selling bottled drinks immediately.
- Visitors would drink more water without changing bottle purchases.
- Visitors would replace disposable bottles with reusable ones.
정답·해설 보기
Visitors would replace disposable bottles with reusable ones.
정답: “Visitors would replace disposable bottles with reusable ones.”. 근거: “bring reusable bottles instead of buying drinks in disposable plastic ones.”. “Visitors would buy more bottled drinks.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. “Visitors would drink more water without changing bottle purchases.” 확인: 일부 세부 정보이지만 핵심 질문에 답하지 못합니다. 근거: “Others said the station simply made it easier to drink more water.”.
What a refill station changed
Why was the number of refills insufficient to measure plastic savings?
- The counter included only people who bought bottled drinks.
- Some users already brought water from home.
- The total showed how many bottles were bought across town.
- The tap was too low for adults to use.
정답·해설 보기
Some users already brought water from home.
정답: “Some users already brought water from home.”. 근거: “Some people had always brought water from home.”. “The counter included only people who bought bottled drinks.” 확인: 본문에 이 정보는 없습니다. 임의로 덧붙이지 마세요. “The total showed how many bottles were bought across town.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다.
What a refill station changed
How many survey respondents reported stopping bottle purchases at the centre?
- Eighty.
- Eighteen.
- Fifty.
- Thirty.
정답·해설 보기
Thirty.
정답: “Thirty.”. 근거: “thirty said they had stopped buying a plastic bottle at the centre”. “Eighty.” 확인: 질문에서 묻는 대상의 숫자가 다릅니다. 근거: “Among the eighty people who answered”. “Fifty.” 확인: 질문에서 묻는 대상의 숫자가 다릅니다. 근거: “Among the eighty people who answered, thirty said they had stopped buying a plastic bottle at the centre”.
What a refill station changed
How does the manager present the project?
- A project with no value until all bottled drinks are removed.
- A complete answer to town waste.
- A useful but limited step.
- A complete measure of waste at and outside the centre.
정답·해설 보기
A useful but limited step.
정답: “A useful but limited step.”. 근거: “a useful step rather than a complete solution.”. “A complete answer to town waste.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다. “A project with no value until all bottled drinks are removed.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다.
What a refill station changed
What accessibility change was made?
- A lower tap was added.
- The picture sign was replaced with written directions.
- Children received automatic bottle refills.
- The original high tap was made the only access point.
정답·해설 보기
A lower tap was added.
정답: “A lower tap was added.”. 근거: “the centre added a lower tap.”. “The original high tap was made the only access point.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. “Children received automatic bottle refills.” 확인: 본문에 이 정보는 없습니다. 임의로 덧붙이지 마세요.
What a refill station changed
Why might the survey not describe all visitors accurately?
- Participation was voluntary.
- The responses measured all waste across the town.
- The eighty respondents were all centre employees.
- Everyone who used the station was required to respond.
정답·해설 보기
Participation was voluntary.
정답: “Participation was voluntary.”. 근거: “The survey was voluntary, so it may not represent every visitor.”. “The eighty respondents were all centre employees.” 확인: 본문에 이 정보는 없습니다. 임의로 덧붙이지 마세요. “Everyone who used the station was required to respond.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다.
What a refill station changed
What will staff compare next?
- Bottle sales in busy weeks against sales in quiet weeks.
- The number of signs with the number of lower taps.
- The town’s total waste before and after the station opened.
- Bottle sales during similarly busy weeks.
정답·해설 보기
Bottle sales during similarly busy weeks.
정답: “Bottle sales during similarly busy weeks.”. 근거: “compare bottle sales over similar busy weeks.”. “Bottle sales in busy weeks against sales in quiet weeks.” 확인: 본문의 조건을 바꾸거나 빠뜨렸습니다. “The number of signs with the number of lower taps.” 확인: 이 행동에 대해 언급된 물건이 아닙니다.
What a refill station changed
Which claim would go beyond the article’s evidence?
- Some users changed their purchasing habits.
- A sign was redesigned.
- The initial tap height caused difficulty.
- The station solved the town’s plastic problem.
정답·해설 보기
The station solved the town’s plastic problem.
정답: “The station solved the town’s plastic problem.”. 근거: “without claiming that one machine can solve the town’s plastic problem.”. “Some users changed their purchasing habits.” 확인: 이는 본문이 뒷받침합니다. 질문은 근거를 넘어서는 주장을 묻습니다. 근거: “thirty said they had stopped buying a plastic bottle at the centre”. “A sign was redesigned.” 확인: 이는 본문이 뒷받침합니다. 질문은 근거를 넘어서는 주장을 묻습니다. 근거: “A sign that only said “Refill here” was replaced with a picture”.