Redesigning an exhibition · B2. Combine the actual clues without adding an unsupported fact. Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event.
Listen to the original English recording, answer the questions, then open the transcript to check the evidence. These related questions use the same recording; the level is an editorial guide, not a certified result.
Listen to the original English recording, answer the questions, then open the transcript to check the evidence. These related questions use the same recording; the level is an editorial guide, not a certified result.
Combine the actual clues without adding an unsupported fact. Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event.
The bag is wet and the umbrella is open: these are clues, not a complete history.
Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event. Use the reason actually given; a plausible reason from outside the text is not enough.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
Separate supported claims from what the evidence leaves unknown. No mention does not prove absence. Use the whole text: a true detail is not automatically the main point.
The notice gives a price, but says nothing about delivery.
Listen to the original English recording, answer the questions, then open the transcript to check the evidence. These related questions use the same recording; the level is an editorial guide, not a certified result.
Access is more than an entrance
Combine the actual clues without adding an unsupported fact. Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event.
The bag is wet and the umbrella is open: these are clues, not a complete history.Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event. Use the reason actually given; a plausible reason from outside the text is not enough.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.Separate supported claims from what the evidence leaves unknown. No mention does not prove absence. Use the whole text: a true detail is not automatically the main point.
The notice gives a price, but says nothing about delivery.Keep your first attempt, check the evidence and try another question. A follow-up on the same material does not prove transfer to a new text.
No practice notes yet. Try a short warm-up.
Combine the actual clues without adding an unsupported fact. Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event.
The bag is wet and the umbrella is open: these are clues, not a complete history.Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event. Use the reason actually given; a plausible reason from outside the text is not enough.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.Separate supported claims from what the evidence leaves unknown. No mention does not prove absence. Use the whole text: a true detail is not automatically the main point.
The notice gives a price, but says nothing about delivery.Opening an answer records help for that question.
Access is more than an entrance
The supported answer is “That access had been discussed too narrowly.”. Evidence: “it also revealed how narrowly we had discussed access.”. Compare the alternative “That the museum had decided to prioritise written information over physical access.”. This adds a specific detail that the account does not provide; plausibility is not textual evidence. Compare the alternative “That solving the entrance problem would make the exhibition accessible overall.”. This makes one indicator sufficient on its own, although the passage calls for a broader assessment.
Access is more than an entrance
The supported answer is “Difficulty standing mattered as well as text difficulty.”. Evidence: “Some found the language demanding, while others could read it easily but could not stand in one position for long enough.”. Compare the alternative “The language was easy enough that text difficulty could be ruled out.”. This reverses the relationship stated in the passage. Compare the alternative “Everyone heading for the bench had difficulty understanding the panels.”. This extends a qualified finding into a claim without exceptions.
Access is more than an entrance
The supported answer is “Production and maintenance need time, and the trial’s coverage was limited.”. Evidence: “Producing and maintaining accurate descriptions takes time, and our trial covered only a small group of objects.”. Compare the alternative “The trial established that recorded descriptions were less helpful than written ones.”. This claims more certainty or wider applicability than this evidence allows. Compare the alternative “Feedback had already settled which objects would need descriptions.”. This reverses the relationship stated in the passage.
Access is more than an entrance
The supported answer is “In a separate booklet.”. Evidence: “We shortened the main text, kept fuller explanations available in a separate booklet”. Compare the alternative “On the shortened main panels themselves.”. This reverses the relationship stated in the passage. Compare the alternative “In the audio description produced for every object.”. This adds a specific detail that the account does not provide; plausibility is not textual evidence.
Access is more than an entrance
The supported answer is “Observation showed problems with how people moved around them.”. Evidence: “a seat in the wrong place could obstruct a wheelchair’s turning space. We changed the positions twice after watching how people moved”. Compare the alternative “Visitors could hear the audio only from seats placed near the entrance.”. This adds a specific detail that the account does not provide; plausibility is not textual evidence. Compare the alternative “The initial office drawing showed that the trial positions were correct.”. This reverses the relationship stated in the passage.
Access is more than an entrance
The supported answer is “Access should shape ongoing design decisions, not just a final check.”. Evidence: “the important shift is away from treating access as a final check on an otherwise finished exhibition.”. Compare the alternative “A physical access improvement is sufficient grounds to finish the design review.”. This treats availability, completion or documentation as sufficient proof of practical quality. Compare the alternative “Equal access is best achieved by requiring one common explanation format.”. This extends a qualified finding into a claim without exceptions.
Access is more than an entrance
The supported answer is “A choice of how to access information.”. Evidence: “Visitors could choose which explanation to use instead of being required to follow one route through identical information.”. Compare the alternative “A fixed order requiring each visitor to use text, booklet and audio.”. This reverses the relationship stated in the passage. Compare the alternative “The ability to revise the factual content of the museum’s records.”. Visitors can choose how to receive an explanation. That choice does not grant authority to revise the museum’s historical records.
Access is more than an entrance
The supported answer is “Different text formats and seating near displays.”. Evidence: “We have decided to keep the choice of text formats and the seating close to displays.”. Compare the alternative “A single bench by the exit and longer panels.”. This confuses two stages of the account: the initial situation and a later check or decision. Compare the alternative “The seat layout originally selected in the office.”. This confuses two stages of the account: the initial situation and a later check or decision.
Access is more than an entrance
The supported answer is “The background detail omitted from the shorter panels.”. Evidence: “several regular visitors missed the background detail until they discovered the booklet.”. Compare the alternative “The fuller explanation that the trial removed from every available format.”. This reverses the relationship stated in the passage. Compare the alternative “The longer standing time expected in the original gallery.”. This substitutes a different outcome for the one that was measured or reported.
Access is more than an entrance
The supported answer is “Explaining decisions and reconsidering assumptions when feedback challenges them.”. Evidence: “It means that the reasons for our decisions should be visible and open to revision, especially when the people affected tell us that our assumptions were wrong.”. Compare the alternative “Treating each suggestion as an instruction that must be implemented immediately.”. This extends a qualified finding into a claim without exceptions. Compare the alternative “Letting visitors approve all historical interpretation before any display opens.”. This adds a specific detail that the account does not provide; plausibility is not textual evidence.