A planning discussion · B2. Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event. Keep the stated condition or permission; a rule does not prove that an event happened.
Listen to the original script when local audio is available. Notice corrections and reasons; use the transcript after listening to check your evidence.
Listen to the original script when local audio is available. Notice corrections and reasons; use the transcript after listening to check your evidence.
Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event. Keep the stated condition or permission; a rule does not prove that an event happened.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
Separate supported claims from what the evidence leaves unknown. No mention does not prove absence. Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event.
The notice gives a price, but says nothing about delivery.
Look for evaluations and reservations; do not turn a positive fact into unconditional approval. Ask what the person or message is trying to achieve, and for whom.
The writer likes the idea but asks for one change.
Listen to the original script when local audio is available. Notice corrections and reasons; use the transcript after listening to check your evidence.
Planning the evening workshop
Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event. Keep the stated condition or permission; a rule does not prove that an event happened.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.Look for evaluations and reservations; do not turn a positive fact into unconditional approval. Ask what the person or message is trying to achieve, and for whom.
The writer likes the idea but asks for one change.Keep your first attempt, check the evidence and try another question. A follow-up on the same material does not prove transfer to a new text.
No practice notes yet. Try a short warm-up.
Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event. Keep the stated condition or permission; a rule does not prove that an event happened.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.Separate supported claims from what the evidence leaves unknown. No mention does not prove absence. Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event.
The notice gives a price, but says nothing about delivery.Look for evaluations and reservations; do not turn a positive fact into unconditional approval. Ask what the person or message is trying to achieve, and for whom.
The writer likes the idea but asks for one change.Opening an answer records help for that question.
Planning the evening workshop
The supported answer is “Two ninety-minute sessions ending by eight thirty.”. Evidence: “two ninety-minute sessions, both finishing by eight thirty.”. Compare the alternative “One three-hour session finishing before the final bus.”. This confuses two stages of the account: the initial situation and a later check or decision. Compare the alternative “Two ninety-minute sessions finishing at nine.”. This attaches a real or plausible number, time or duration to the wrong event.
Planning the evening workshop
The supported answer is “Recording may discourage people from asking them.”. Evidence: “some participants may hesitate to ask questions if they know their comments will be shared.”. Compare the alternative “The separate explanation is intended to replace all participant discussion.”. This mistakes a supporting example or practical detail for the main purpose being asked about. Compare the alternative “Written instructions would be withdrawn once the workshop was recorded.”. This reverses the relationship stated in the passage.
Planning the evening workshop
The supported answer is “Suitable access must be verified by Wednesday.”. Evidence: “If we cannot verify suitable access by Wednesday, we will book the college”. Compare the alternative “The catering budget must cover a full buffet.”. This replaces the stated basis for judging a decision with a different criterion. Compare the alternative “The college must be unavailable by the booking deadline.”. This adds a specific detail that the account does not provide; plausibility is not textual evidence.
Planning the evening workshop
The supported answer is “Participants can complete the activity independently afterwards.”. Evidence: “participants to leave able to complete the activity independently.”. Compare the alternative “Whether the revised arrangement fills the room.”. This makes one indicator sufficient on its own, although the passage calls for a broader assessment. Compare the alternative “Whether certificates can distinguish the strongest participants.”. Ranking the strongest participants or deciding certificates is explicitly rejected. Success is whether participants can complete the activity independently afterwards. Check the source wording “It would inform improvements, not rank participants or decide who deserves a certificate.” against the question and the claim “Whether certificates can distinguish the strongest participants.”.
Planning the evening workshop
The supported answer is “Less money available for refreshments.”. Evidence: “that leaves less money for refreshments.”. Compare the alternative “A shorter written explanation for those missing a session.”. This substitutes a different outcome for the one that was measured or reported. Compare the alternative “A later finish that leaves less time to catch the last bus.”. This substitutes a different outcome for the one that was measured or reported.
Planning the evening workshop
The supported answer is “To improve the explanation, without ranking participants.”. Evidence: “It would inform improvements, not rank participants or decide who deserves a certificate.”. Compare the alternative “To identify participants whose performance qualifies them for a certificate.”. This reverses the relationship stated in the passage. Compare the alternative “To replace practice in the sessions with an assessment afterwards.”. The follow-up checks whether the explanation was clear and informs improvements. No proposal replaces practice during the sessions with this later task.