명시된 세부 정보 · 근거의 한계
질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 근거가 있는 주장과 아직 모르는 것을 나누세요. 언급이 없다고 없다는 증거는 아닙니다.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
디지털 휴식 일기 · B1. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 근거가 있는 주장과 아직 모르는 것을 나누세요. 언급이 없다고 없다는 증거는 아닙니다.
직접 작성한 영어 자료를 읽고 근거를 찾아 답하세요. 수준 표기는 편집상의 안내이며 인증 결과가 아닙니다.
I did not give up my phone for a week. That would have been difficult because I use it for work messages and train tickets. Instead, I tried one smaller change: no social media after dinner. I wanted to find out whether I would read more, not prove that phones were bad.
On Monday, I put my phone on a high shelf and opened a novel. Within ten minutes, I reached for the phone three times without thinking. There was no message I needed to answer. I simply wanted something to do when the story became difficult. I read only six pages, but noticing that habit felt useful.
Tuesday was easier until a friend sent a funny video. I watched it on my laptop, then realised that changing the device had not changed the activity. I added the laptop to my evening rule. I still allowed calls and direct messages from family, because being unavailable to them was not my goal.
By Thursday, I was reading for longer, but I was also going to bed later. I had chosen an exciting book and kept saying, “One more chapter.” My sister laughed when I told her. The point was to make deliberate choices, she said, not replace one endless activity with another. I started setting a time to stop reading as well.
At the weekend, I went back through the notes I had made each evening. I had finished more pages than usual, but that alone did not tell me whether I had rested better. Some evenings felt calm; others did not. I had not recorded my sleeping times before the experiment, so I could not make a fair comparison.
I am keeping the phone shelf and the reading time. I am not keeping a strict ban for every evening: sometimes a shared online game with a distant friend is exactly how I want to spend my time. The useful change is asking what I intend to do before I start, rather than letting one link lead automatically to the next.
질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 근거가 있는 주장과 아직 모르는 것을 나누세요. 언급이 없다고 없다는 증거는 아닙니다.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
사람이나 메시지가 누구를 위해 무엇을 이루려는지 생각하세요. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.
This note tells visitors where to wait.
실제 단서를 연결하되 근거 없는 사실을 더하지 마세요. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 사람이나 메시지가 누구를 위해 무엇을 이루려는지 생각하세요.
The bag is wet and the umbrella is open: these are clues, not a complete history.
I did not give up my phone for a week. That would have been difficult because I use it for work messages and train tickets. Instead, I tried one smaller change: no social media after dinner. I wanted to find out whether I would read more, not prove that phones were bad.
On Monday, I put my phone on a high shelf and opened a novel. Within ten minutes, I reached for the phone three times without thinking. There was no message I needed to answer. I simply wanted something to do when the story became difficult. I read only six pages, but noticing that habit felt useful.
Tuesday was easier until a friend sent a funny video. I watched it on my laptop, then realised that changing the device had not changed the activity. I added the laptop to my evening rule. I still allowed calls and direct messages from family, because being unavailable to them was not my goal.
By Thursday, I was reading for longer, but I was also going to bed later. I had chosen an exciting book and kept saying, “One more chapter.” My sister laughed when I told her. The point was to make deliberate choices, she said, not replace one endless activity with another. I started setting a time to stop reading as well.
At the weekend, I went back through the notes I had made each evening. I had finished more pages than usual, but that alone did not tell me whether I had rested better. Some evenings felt calm; others did not. I had not recorded my sleeping times before the experiment, so I could not make a fair comparison.
I am keeping the phone shelf and the reading time. I am not keeping a strict ban for every evening: sometimes a shared online game with a distant friend is exactly how I want to spend my time. The useful change is asking what I intend to do before I start, rather than letting one link lead automatically to the next.
A digital break diary
질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 근거가 있는 주장과 아직 모르는 것을 나누세요. 언급이 없다고 없다는 증거는 아닙니다.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.사람이나 메시지가 누구를 위해 무엇을 이루려는지 생각하세요. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.
This note tells visitors where to wait.실제 단서를 연결하되 근거 없는 사실을 더하지 마세요. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 사람이나 메시지가 누구를 위해 무엇을 이루려는지 생각하세요.
The bag is wet and the umbrella is open: these are clues, not a complete history.첫 답을 남기고 근거를 확인한 뒤 다른 문제를 풀어 보세요. 같은 자료에서 맞혔다고 새 지문에도 적용할 수 있다는 뜻은 아니에요.
아직 복습 노트가 없어요. 짧은 워밍업부터 해보세요.
질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 근거가 있는 주장과 아직 모르는 것을 나누세요. 언급이 없다고 없다는 증거는 아닙니다.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.사람이나 메시지가 누구를 위해 무엇을 이루려는지 생각하세요. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요.
This note tells visitors where to wait.실제 단서를 연결하되 근거 없는 사실을 더하지 마세요. 질문에 나온 사람·시간·장소·수량을 해당 사건과 연결하세요. 사람이나 메시지가 누구를 위해 무엇을 이루려는지 생각하세요.
The bag is wet and the umbrella is open: these are clues, not a complete history.정답을 열면 해당 문제에 도움 사용이 기록돼요.
A digital break diary
정답: “Avoid social media after dinner.”. 근거: “no social media after dinner.”. “Give up all phone use for a week.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “I did not give up my phone for a week.”. “Stop reading novels.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “I wanted to find out whether I would read more”.
A digital break diary
정답: “It was needed for work messages and train tickets.”. 근거: “I use it for work messages and train tickets.”. “The evening rule applied to the laptop rather than the phone.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “I added the laptop to my evening rule.”. “The experiment required answering social-media posts every night.” 확인: 본문에 이 정보는 없습니다. 임의로 덧붙이지 마세요.
A digital break diary
정답: “Calls and direct family messages.”. 근거: “I still allowed calls and direct messages from family”. “Every video shared by a friend.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다. 근거: “I added the laptop to my evening rule.”. “Social media on the phone, provided reading came first.” 확인: 본문의 조건을 바꾸거나 빠뜨렸습니다. 근거: “I added the laptop to my evening rule.”.
A digital break diary
정답: “Six pages.”. 근거: “I read only six pages”. “Three pages.” 확인: 질문에서 묻는 대상의 숫자가 다릅니다. 근거: “I reached for the phone three times”. “Ten pages.” 확인: 질문에서 묻는 대상의 숫자가 다릅니다. 근거: “Within ten minutes”.
A digital break diary
정답: “The same activity could continue on another device.”. 근거: “changing the device had not changed the activity.”. “A laptop could not show social media.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “I watched it on my laptop”. “Avoiding the phone was enough to meet the aim, whatever happened on the laptop.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다.
A digital break diary
정답: “A habit of escaping when reading became difficult.”. 근거: “I simply wanted something to do when the story became difficult.”. “An urgent work problem.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “There was no message I needed to answer.”. “Difficulty reaching a phone placed too high.” 확인: 이 행동에 대해 제시된 이유가 아닙니다.
A digital break diary
정답: “Reading was delaying bedtime.”. 근거: “I was reading for longer, but I was also going to bed later.”. “The new rule limited reading to six pages every night.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다. 근거: “I read only six pages”. “Family calls prevented reading every evening.” 확인: 본문에 이 정보는 없습니다. 임의로 덧붙이지 마세요.
A digital break diary
정답: “Deliberate choices rather than another activity without limits.”. 근거: “The point was to make deliberate choices, she said, not replace one endless activity with another.”. “Sticking to a ban even when contact with friends was intentional.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “not replace one endless activity with another.”. “Replacing reading with a different unlimited activity.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다.
A digital break diary
정답: “A time to stop reading.”. 근거: “I started setting a time to stop reading as well.”. “A limit of six pages for every book.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다. 근거: “I read only six pages”. “A ban on reading at weekends.” 확인: 본문에 이 정보는 없습니다. 임의로 덧붙이지 마세요.
A digital break diary
정답: “No earlier sleeping times had been recorded.”. 근거: “I had not recorded my sleeping times before the experiment”. “Every evening of the experiment was identical.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “Some evenings felt calm; others did not.”. “The earlier evenings all involved the same activities.” 확인: 본문에 이 정보는 없습니다. 임의로 덧붙이지 마세요.
A digital break diary
정답: “It can be an intentional way to connect with a distant friend.”. 근거: “sometimes a shared online game with a distant friend is exactly how I want to spend my time.”. “An online game guarantees a calmer evening than reading.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다. “Reading more no longer matters once the experiment ends.” 확인: 본문이 허용하는 범위나 확실성보다 과장했습니다.
A digital break diary
정답: “Being intentional matters more than keeping an absolute ban.”. 근거: “The useful change is asking what I intend to do before I start”. “Changing devices solves unwanted habits by itself.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “changing the device had not changed the activity.”. “Every evening should follow the same rule without exceptions.” 확인: 해당 정보와 반대되는 내용입니다. 근거: “I am not keeping a strict ban for every evening”.