明示された詳細・根拠の限界
問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。 根拠のある主張と不明なことを分けます。記載がないだけでは存在しないと証明できません。
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
デジタル休息の日記 · B1. 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。 根拠のある主張と不明なことを分けます。記載がないだけでは存在しないと証明できません。
オリジナルの英文を読み、根拠を基に答えましょう。レベルは編集上の目安で、認定結果ではありません。
I did not give up my phone for a week. That would have been difficult because I use it for work messages and train tickets. Instead, I tried one smaller change: no social media after dinner. I wanted to find out whether I would read more, not prove that phones were bad.
On Monday, I put my phone on a high shelf and opened a novel. Within ten minutes, I reached for the phone three times without thinking. There was no message I needed to answer. I simply wanted something to do when the story became difficult. I read only six pages, but noticing that habit felt useful.
Tuesday was easier until a friend sent a funny video. I watched it on my laptop, then realised that changing the device had not changed the activity. I added the laptop to my evening rule. I still allowed calls and direct messages from family, because being unavailable to them was not my goal.
By Thursday, I was reading for longer, but I was also going to bed later. I had chosen an exciting book and kept saying, “One more chapter.” My sister laughed when I told her. The point was to make deliberate choices, she said, not replace one endless activity with another. I started setting a time to stop reading as well.
At the weekend, I went back through the notes I had made each evening. I had finished more pages than usual, but that alone did not tell me whether I had rested better. Some evenings felt calm; others did not. I had not recorded my sleeping times before the experiment, so I could not make a fair comparison.
I am keeping the phone shelf and the reading time. I am not keeping a strict ban for every evening: sometimes a shared online game with a distant friend is exactly how I want to spend my time. The useful change is asking what I intend to do before I start, rather than letting one link lead automatically to the next.
問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。 根拠のある主張と不明なことを分けます。記載がないだけでは存在しないと証明できません。
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
人やメッセージが、誰のために何を達成しようとしているか考えます。 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
This note tells visitors where to wait.
実際の手がかりを組み合わせ、裏付けのない事実を足しません。 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。 人やメッセージが、誰のために何を達成しようとしているか考えます。
The bag is wet and the umbrella is open: these are clues, not a complete history.
I did not give up my phone for a week. That would have been difficult because I use it for work messages and train tickets. Instead, I tried one smaller change: no social media after dinner. I wanted to find out whether I would read more, not prove that phones were bad.
On Monday, I put my phone on a high shelf and opened a novel. Within ten minutes, I reached for the phone three times without thinking. There was no message I needed to answer. I simply wanted something to do when the story became difficult. I read only six pages, but noticing that habit felt useful.
Tuesday was easier until a friend sent a funny video. I watched it on my laptop, then realised that changing the device had not changed the activity. I added the laptop to my evening rule. I still allowed calls and direct messages from family, because being unavailable to them was not my goal.
By Thursday, I was reading for longer, but I was also going to bed later. I had chosen an exciting book and kept saying, “One more chapter.” My sister laughed when I told her. The point was to make deliberate choices, she said, not replace one endless activity with another. I started setting a time to stop reading as well.
At the weekend, I went back through the notes I had made each evening. I had finished more pages than usual, but that alone did not tell me whether I had rested better. Some evenings felt calm; others did not. I had not recorded my sleeping times before the experiment, so I could not make a fair comparison.
I am keeping the phone shelf and the reading time. I am not keeping a strict ban for every evening: sometimes a shared online game with a distant friend is exactly how I want to spend my time. The useful change is asking what I intend to do before I start, rather than letting one link lead automatically to the next.
A digital break diary
問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。 根拠のある主張と不明なことを分けます。記載がないだけでは存在しないと証明できません。
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.人やメッセージが、誰のために何を達成しようとしているか考えます。 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
This note tells visitors where to wait.実際の手がかりを組み合わせ、裏付けのない事実を足しません。 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。 人やメッセージが、誰のために何を達成しようとしているか考えます。
The bag is wet and the umbrella is open: these are clues, not a complete history.初回答を残し、根拠を確かめて別の問題に挑戦します。同じ教材での正解は、新しい文章への応用を証明するものではありません。
まだ復習ノートはありません。まずは短いウォームアップを。
問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。 根拠のある主張と不明なことを分けます。記載がないだけでは存在しないと証明できません。
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.人やメッセージが、誰のために何を達成しようとしているか考えます。 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
This note tells visitors where to wait.実際の手がかりを組み合わせ、裏付けのない事実を足しません。 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。 人やメッセージが、誰のために何を達成しようとしているか考えます。
The bag is wet and the umbrella is open: these are clues, not a complete history.解答を開くと、その問題にヒント利用が記録されます。
A digital break diary
答え:「Avoid social media after dinner.」。 根拠:「no social media after dinner.」。 「Give up all phone use for a week.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。 根拠:「I did not give up my phone for a week.」。 「Stop reading novels.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。 根拠:「I wanted to find out whether I would read more」。
A digital break diary
答え:「It was needed for work messages and train tickets.」。 根拠:「I use it for work messages and train tickets.」。 「The evening rule applied to the laptop rather than the phone.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。 根拠:「I added the laptop to my evening rule.」。 「The experiment required answering social-media posts every night.」を確認:本文にはこの情報がありません。付け足さないようにしましょう。
A digital break diary
答え:「Calls and direct family messages.」。 根拠:「I still allowed calls and direct messages from family」。 「Every video shared by a friend.」を確認:本文で言える範囲や強さを超えています。 根拠:「I added the laptop to my evening rule.」。 「Social media on the phone, provided reading came first.」を確認:本文の条件を変えたり省いたりしています。 根拠:「I added the laptop to my evening rule.」。
A digital break diary
答え:「Six pages.」。 根拠:「I read only six pages」。 「Three pages.」を確認:問われたものの数値とは違います。 根拠:「I reached for the phone three times」。 「Ten pages.」を確認:問われたものの数値とは違います。 根拠:「Within ten minutes」。
A digital break diary
答え:「The same activity could continue on another device.」。 根拠:「changing the device had not changed the activity.」。 「A laptop could not show social media.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。 根拠:「I watched it on my laptop」。 「Avoiding the phone was enough to meet the aim, whatever happened on the laptop.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。
A digital break diary
答え:「A habit of escaping when reading became difficult.」。 根拠:「I simply wanted something to do when the story became difficult.」。 「An urgent work problem.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。 根拠:「There was no message I needed to answer.」。 「Difficulty reaching a phone placed too high.」を確認:この行動について示された理由ではありません。
A digital break diary
答え:「Reading was delaying bedtime.」。 根拠:「I was reading for longer, but I was also going to bed later.」。 「The new rule limited reading to six pages every night.」を確認:本文で言える範囲や強さを超えています。 根拠:「I read only six pages」。 「Family calls prevented reading every evening.」を確認:本文にはこの情報がありません。付け足さないようにしましょう。
A digital break diary
答え:「Deliberate choices rather than another activity without limits.」。 根拠:「The point was to make deliberate choices, she said, not replace one endless activity with another.」。 「Sticking to a ban even when contact with friends was intentional.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。 根拠:「not replace one endless activity with another.」。 「Replacing reading with a different unlimited activity.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。
A digital break diary
答え:「A time to stop reading.」。 根拠:「I started setting a time to stop reading as well.」。 「A limit of six pages for every book.」を確認:本文で言える範囲や強さを超えています。 根拠:「I read only six pages」。 「A ban on reading at weekends.」を確認:本文にはこの情報がありません。付け足さないようにしましょう。
A digital break diary
答え:「No earlier sleeping times had been recorded.」。 根拠:「I had not recorded my sleeping times before the experiment」。 「Every evening of the experiment was identical.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。 根拠:「Some evenings felt calm; others did not.」。 「The earlier evenings all involved the same activities.」を確認:本文にはこの情報がありません。付け足さないようにしましょう。
A digital break diary
答え:「It can be an intentional way to connect with a distant friend.」。 根拠:「sometimes a shared online game with a distant friend is exactly how I want to spend my time.」。 「An online game guarantees a calmer evening than reading.」を確認:本文で言える範囲や強さを超えています。 「Reading more no longer matters once the experiment ends.」を確認:本文で言える範囲や強さを超えています。
A digital break diary
答え:「Being intentional matters more than keeping an absolute ban.」。 根拠:「The useful change is asking what I intend to do before I start」。 「Changing devices solves unwanted habits by itself.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。 根拠:「changing the device had not changed the activity.」。 「Every evening should follow the same rule without exceptions.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。 根拠:「I am not keeping a strict ban for every evening」。