明示された詳細
問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
環境についての記事 · B1. 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
オリジナルの英文を読み、根拠を基に答えましょう。レベルは編集上の目安で、認定結果ではありません。
A new water refill station appeared outside Westbridge sports centre last spring. The centre hoped visitors would bring reusable bottles instead of buying drinks in disposable plastic ones. During the first month, staff counted how often the station was used, but that number alone could not show how much plastic had been saved. Some people had always brought water from home. To learn more, the centre asked visitors about their habits. Among the eighty people who answered, thirty said they had stopped buying a plastic bottle at the centre since the station opened. Others said the station simply made it easier to drink more water. The survey was voluntary, so it may not represent every visitor. There were practical difficulties too. The first tap was too high for some children. After a local parent raised the issue, the centre added a lower tap. A sign that only said “Refill here” was replaced with a picture, making the station easier to recognise. The manager describes the project as a useful step rather than a complete solution. The centre still sells bottled drinks, and the survey does not measure waste elsewhere. Next, staff plan to compare bottle sales over similar busy weeks. They hope this will give a clearer picture without claiming that one machine can solve the town’s plastic problem.
問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
実際に示された理由を使います。文外のもっともらしい理由だけでは足りません。 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
We meet inside because it is raining.
評価と留保に注目します。よい事実があるだけで全面的な賛成とは言えません。 根拠のある主張と不明なことを分けます。記載がないだけでは存在しないと証明できません。
The writer likes the idea but asks for one change.
A new water refill station appeared outside Westbridge sports centre last spring. The centre hoped visitors would bring reusable bottles instead of buying drinks in disposable plastic ones. During the first month, staff counted how often the station was used, but that number alone could not show how much plastic had been saved. Some people had always brought water from home. To learn more, the centre asked visitors about their habits. Among the eighty people who answered, thirty said they had stopped buying a plastic bottle at the centre since the station opened. Others said the station simply made it easier to drink more water. The survey was voluntary, so it may not represent every visitor. There were practical difficulties too. The first tap was too high for some children. After a local parent raised the issue, the centre added a lower tap. A sign that only said “Refill here” was replaced with a picture, making the station easier to recognise. The manager describes the project as a useful step rather than a complete solution. The centre still sells bottled drinks, and the survey does not measure waste elsewhere. Next, staff plan to compare bottle sales over similar busy weeks. They hope this will give a clearer picture without claiming that one machine can solve the town’s plastic problem.
What a refill station changed
問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.評価と留保に注目します。よい事実があるだけで全面的な賛成とは言えません。 根拠のある主張と不明なことを分けます。記載がないだけでは存在しないと証明できません。
The writer likes the idea but asks for one change.初回答を残し、根拠を確かめて別の問題に挑戦します。同じ教材での正解は、新しい文章への応用を証明するものではありません。
まだ復習ノートはありません。まずは短いウォームアップを。
問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.実際に示された理由を使います。文外のもっともらしい理由だけでは足りません。 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
We meet inside because it is raining.評価と留保に注目します。よい事実があるだけで全面的な賛成とは言えません。 根拠のある主張と不明なことを分けます。記載がないだけでは存在しないと証明できません。
The writer likes the idea but asks for one change.解答を開くと、その問題にヒント利用が記録されます。
What a refill station changed
答え:「Visitors would replace disposable bottles with reusable ones.」。 根拠:「bring reusable bottles instead of buying drinks in disposable plastic ones.」。 「Visitors would buy more bottled drinks.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。 「Visitors would drink more water without changing bottle purchases.」を確認:一部の情報ですが、中心となる問いには答えていません。 根拠:「Others said the station simply made it easier to drink more water.」。
What a refill station changed
答え:「Some users already brought water from home.」。 根拠:「Some people had always brought water from home.」。 「The counter included only people who bought bottled drinks.」を確認:本文にはこの情報がありません。付け足さないようにしましょう。 「The total showed how many bottles were bought across town.」を確認:本文で言える範囲や強さを超えています。
What a refill station changed
答え:「Thirty.」。 根拠:「thirty said they had stopped buying a plastic bottle at the centre」。 「Eighty.」を確認:問われたものの数値とは違います。 根拠:「Among the eighty people who answered」。 「Fifty.」を確認:問われたものの数値とは違います。 根拠:「Among the eighty people who answered, thirty said they had stopped buying a plastic bottle at the centre」。
What a refill station changed
答え:「A useful but limited step.」。 根拠:「a useful step rather than a complete solution.」。 「A complete answer to town waste.」を確認:本文で言える範囲や強さを超えています。 「A project with no value until all bottled drinks are removed.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。
What a refill station changed
答え:「A lower tap was added.」。 根拠:「the centre added a lower tap.」。 「The original high tap was made the only access point.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。 「Children received automatic bottle refills.」を確認:本文にはこの情報がありません。付け足さないようにしましょう。
What a refill station changed
答え:「Participation was voluntary.」。 根拠:「The survey was voluntary, so it may not represent every visitor.」。 「The eighty respondents were all centre employees.」を確認:本文にはこの情報がありません。付け足さないようにしましょう。 「Everyone who used the station was required to respond.」を確認:該当する情報と反対のことを述べています。
What a refill station changed
答え:「Bottle sales during similarly busy weeks.」。 根拠:「compare bottle sales over similar busy weeks.」。 「Bottle sales in busy weeks against sales in quiet weeks.」を確認:本文の条件を変えたり省いたりしています。 「The number of signs with the number of lower taps.」を確認:この行動について挙げられた物ではありません。
What a refill station changed
答え:「The station solved the town’s plastic problem.」。 根拠:「without claiming that one machine can solve the town’s plastic problem.」。 「Some users changed their purchasing habits.」を確認:これは本文に根拠があります。問われているのは、根拠を超える主張です。 根拠:「thirty said they had stopped buying a plastic bottle at the centre」。 「A sign was redesigned.」を確認:これは本文に根拠があります。問われているのは、根拠を超える主張です。 根拠:「A sign that only said “Refill here” was replaced with a picture」。