Verificar a estrutura verbal
Identifique sujeito, referência temporal e auxiliares antes de escolher a forma verbal.
[1] _____ the draft report, the reviewers asked the authors to explain their sampling method.
Revisar um relatório de pesquisa · B2. Identifique sujeito, referência temporal e auxiliares antes de escolher a forma verbal.
Complete doze lacunas numeradas em um texto original em inglês. Leia os dois lados de cada lacuna e use o contexto completo. O nível é uma referência editorial.

Complete doze lacunas numeradas em um texto original em inglês. Leia os dois lados de cada lacuna e use o contexto completo. O nível é uma referência editorial.
[1] _____ the draft report, the reviewers asked the authors to explain their sampling method. The original argument had been based [2] _____ responses from a small online group. Before requesting a new survey, the authors [3] _____ that some age groups were missing.
This raised questions about the [4] _____ of the conclusions to people outside that group. [5] _____ the responses were genuine, the sample did not represent the whole community. The reviewers recommended [6] _____ how participants had been recruited.
They also asked for a clear distinction [7] _____ a reported preference and an observed action. A researcher, [8] _____ objections had initially been overlooked, proposed a follow-up interview study. Not until the revised analysis had been checked [9] _____ the authors submit the final version.
Had they kept the original wording, they [10] _____ a stronger claim than their evidence supported. The revised conclusion focused on describing the responses, [11] _____ than predicting everyone’s future behaviour. The most [12] _____ improvement was the separation of results from speculation.
Identifique sujeito, referência temporal e auxiliares antes de escolher a forma verbal.
[1] _____ the draft report, the reviewers asked the authors to explain their sampling method.
Leia os dois lados da lacuna. Confira artigos, pronomes, preposições e expressões fixas como uma construção completa.
The original argument had been based [2] _____ responses from a small online group.
Identifique causa, contraste, condição ou referência. Depois confira a gramática exigida pelo elemento de ligação.
[5] _____ the responses were genuine, the sample did not represent the whole community.

Complete doze lacunas numeradas em um texto original em inglês. Leia os dois lados de cada lacuna e use o contexto completo. O nível é uma referência editorial.
[1] _____ the draft report, the reviewers asked the authors to explain their sampling method. The original argument had been based [2] _____ responses from a small online group. Before requesting a new survey, the authors [3] _____ that some age groups were missing.
This raised questions about the [4] _____ of the conclusions to people outside that group. [5] _____ the responses were genuine, the sample did not represent the whole community. The reviewers recommended [6] _____ how participants had been recruited.
They also asked for a clear distinction [7] _____ a reported preference and an observed action. A researcher, [8] _____ objections had initially been overlooked, proposed a follow-up interview study. Not until the revised analysis had been checked [9] _____ the authors submit the final version.
Had they kept the original wording, they [10] _____ a stronger claim than their evidence supported. The revised conclusion focused on describing the responses, [11] _____ than predicting everyone’s future behaviour. The most [12] _____ improvement was the separation of results from speculation.
Reviewing a research report — gap 1
Leia os dois lados da lacuna. Confira artigos, pronomes, preposições e expressões fixas como uma construção completa.
The original argument had been based [2] _____ responses from a small online group.Identifique causa, contraste, condição ou referência. Depois confira a gramática exigida pelo elemento de ligação.
[5] _____ the responses were genuine, the sample did not represent the whole community.Identifique sujeito, referência temporal e auxiliares antes de escolher a forma verbal.
[1] _____ the draft report, the reviewers asked the authors to explain their sampling method.Guarde a primeira tentativa, entenda a mudança e confira em outra situação.
Ainda não há revisões. Faça um aquecimento curto.
Identifique sujeito, referência temporal e auxiliares antes de escolher a forma verbal.
[1] _____ the draft report, the reviewers asked the authors to explain their sampling method.Leia os dois lados da lacuna. Confira artigos, pronomes, preposições e expressões fixas como uma construção completa.
The original argument had been based [2] _____ responses from a small online group.Identifique causa, contraste, condição ou referência. Depois confira a gramática exigida pelo elemento de ligação.
[5] _____ the responses were genuine, the sample did not represent the whole community.Abrir uma resposta registra ajuda para essa questão.
Reviewing a research report — gap 1
A pista decisiva é “[1] _____ the draft report, the reviewers asked the authors to explain their sampling method.”. Use having + past participle para expressar uma ação explicitamente concluída antes do evento principal. Nesta tarefa, a frase completa é “Having examined the draft report, the reviewers asked the authors to explain their sampling method.”.
Reviewing a research report — gap 2
A pista decisiva é “The original argument had been based [2] _____ responses from a small online group.”. A combinação é based on para uma base ou place emphasis on para um foco. Na frase completa, on introduz essa base ou foco. Nesta tarefa, a frase completa é “The original argument had been based on responses from a small online group.”.
Reviewing a research report — gap 3
A pista decisiva é “Before requesting a new survey, the authors [3] _____ that some age groups were missing.”. Use had + past participle para expressar um evento concluído antes de outro momento passado. Nesta tarefa, a frase completa é “Before requesting a new survey, the authors had realised that some age groups were missing.”.
Reviewing a research report — gap 4
A pista decisiva é “This raised questions about the [4] _____ of the conclusions to people outside that group.”. Entre the e of the findings/conclusions, nomeia-se uma propriedade: applicability, até que ponto os resultados se aplicam além da amostra inicial. Nesta tarefa, a frase completa é “This raised questions about the applicability of the conclusions to people outside that group.”.
Reviewing a research report — gap 5
A pista decisiva é “[5] _____ the responses were genuine, the sample did not represent the whole community.”. Use although/even though + finite clause para expressar uma concessão seguida de sujeito e verbo conjugado. Nesta tarefa, a frase completa é “Although the responses were genuine, the sample did not represent the whole community.”.
Reviewing a research report — gap 6
A pista decisiva é “The reviewers recommended [6] _____ how participants had been recruited.”. Propose/recommend seguido diretamente de ação leva complemento -ing aqui. O plano é a ação em si, não um tempo finito ou infinitivo com to inserido. Nesta tarefa, a frase completa é “The reviewers recommended documenting how participants had been recruited.”.
Reviewing a research report — gap 7
A pista decisiva é “They also asked for a clear distinction [7] _____ a reported preference and an observed action.”. Make a distinction between A and B nomeia dois conceitos cuja diferença importa; between completa esse padrão comparativo. Nesta tarefa, a frase completa é “They also asked for a clear distinction between a reported preference and an observed action.”.
Reviewing a research report — gap 8
A pista decisiva é “A researcher, [8] _____ objections had initially been overlooked, proposed a follow-up interview study.”. A relativa começa com um nome associado ao antecedente, como work, family ou objections. Whose marca essa relação possessiva e o nome seguinte permanece. Nesta tarefa, a frase completa é “A researcher, whose objections had initially been overlooked, proposed a follow-up interview study.”.
Reviewing a research report — gap 9
A pista decisiva é “Not until the revised analysis had been checked [9] _____ the authors submit the final version.”. Use only after/until + clause; inverted main clause para expressar inversão na principal, não dentro da oração com after ou until. Nesta tarefa, a frase completa é “Not until the revised analysis had been checked did the authors submit the final version.”.
Reviewing a research report — gap 10
A pista decisiva é “Had they kept the original wording, they [10] _____ a stronger claim than their evidence supported.”. Use would have + past participle para expressar o resultado passado irreal de uma condição que não aconteceu. Nesta tarefa, a frase completa é “Had they kept the original wording, they would have made a stronger claim than their evidence supported.”.
Reviewing a research report — gap 11
A pista decisiva é “The revised conclusion focused on describing the responses, [11] _____ than predicting everyone’s future behaviour.”. Rather than contrapõe a ação desejada à alternativa rejeitada; ambas têm papéis gramaticais paralelos. Nesta tarefa, a frase completa é “The revised conclusion focused on describing the responses, rather than predicting everyone’s future behaviour.”.
Reviewing a research report — gap 12
A pista decisiva é “The most [12] _____ improvement was the separation of results from speculation.”. A lacuna descreve o achado ou a melhoria seguintes; depois de the most é necessário o adjetivo significant. Nesta tarefa, a frase completa é “The most significant improvement was the separation of results from speculation.”.