提案と確定した約束の違い
話し手が実際に行うと述べた次の行動を選びます。
“We could test it in autumn.” does not mean “The autumn trial is confirmed.”
B2
地域プロジェクトを選ぶ
このレッスンについて
地域プロジェクトを選ぶ · B2. 話し手が実際に行うと述べた次の行動を選びます。
会話全体を聞き、合意・説明・留保を根拠に答えましょう。
8 問
保存するとマイコレクションで見返せます。
まずはポイントを確認
留保付きの賛成と優先事項
賛成の発言と留保を合わせて態度を捉えます。
“The idea has value, although the costs need checking.”
根拠と別の説明の可能性
別の要因でも結果を説明できるため、結果だけでは原因を断定できません。
“Sales rose in a holiday week; the new display may not be the only cause.”
01 / 8D01保存するとマイコレクションで見返せます。
Choosing a community project
Why does Elliot question choosing the garden from the signatures alone?
学習ルート
01
ステップ 1 · ウォームアップ
0/2ウォームアップ
02
ステップ 2 · 理解を深める
0/4根拠と別の説明の可能性
別の要因でも結果を説明できるため、結果だけでは原因を断定できません。
“Sales rose in a holiday week; the new display may not be the only cause.”03
ステップ 3 · 関連練習
0/1関連練習
04
ステップ 4 · 教材チャレンジ
0/1教材チャレンジ
この単元の復習ノート
0間違いを、次の一歩に。
初回答を残し、根拠を確かめて別の問題に挑戦します。同じ教材での正解は、新しい文章への応用を証明するものではありません。
まだ復習ノートはありません。まずは短いウォームアップを。
学習マップ
B2地域プロジェクトを選ぶ
この単元のポイント
提案と確定した約束の違い
話し手が実際に行うと述べた次の行動を選びます。
“We could test it in autumn.” does not mean “The autumn trial is confirmed.”留保付きの賛成と優先事項
賛成の発言と留保を合わせて態度を捉えます。
“The idea has value, although the costs need checking.”根拠と別の説明の可能性
別の要因でも結果を説明できるため、結果だけでは原因を断定できません。
“Sales rose in a holiday week; the new display may not be the only cause.”問題と解答
解答を開くと、その問題にヒント利用が記録されます。
Choosing a community project
Why does Elliot question choosing the garden from the signatures alone?
- Some signatures refer to an earlier version of the garden design.
- The signatures were collected before the proposed costs were revised.
- The signatures may mainly reflect an existing interested group.
- Most signatories said they preferred the repair workshop.
解答と解説を開く
The signatures may mainly reflect an existing interested group.
根拠: “The support matters, but signatures alone don't tell us who would actually use it. Most were collected at the gardening club, which already meets nearby.” 回答を集めた場所によって、反映される人々が偏る可能性があります。 根拠に合う答え: “The signatures may mainly reflect an existing interested group.”
Choosing a community project
Why is the repair workshop not yet clearly the cheaper option?
- Its budget needs a higher rent allowance than the garden budget.
- Its listed costs exclude rent as well as insurance.
- It has included tools that the neighbourhood already owns.
- Its budget leaves out insurance.
解答と解説を開く
Its budget leaves out insurance.
根拠: “It might. However, their budget covers tools and rent but leaves out insurance. We shouldn't treat it as a cheaper option until we know the full cost.” 抜けている費用を含む総額で比較します。 根拠に合う答え: “Its budget leaves out insurance.”
Choosing a community project
What does Elliot value more than an impressive launch?
- A plan that can be maintained reliably.
- A scheme chosen chiefly for its existing public support.
- A launch likely to attract visitors from outside the area.
- A project that can start without a pilot event.
解答と解説を開く
A plan that can be maintained reliably.
根拠: “Exactly. I'd rather see a modest plan with reliable cover than an impressive launch that nobody can maintain.” 対比から何をより重視しているかを読み取ります。 根拠に合う答え: “A plan that can be maintained reliably.”
Choosing a community project
Why must the pilot events have the same spending limit?
- They have already agreed to split the annual grant equally.
- Different resources would weaken the attendance comparison.
- They want to compare which group can use up its allowance first.
- They want each group to contribute the same amount of its own money.
解答と解説を開く
Different resources would weaken the attendance comparison.
根拠: “I like that, as long as we set the same spending limit for both. Otherwise attendance would be a poor comparison.” 予算をそろえると一つの違いを抑えられますが、同じ結果や偏りのなさは保証されません。 根拠に合う答え: “Different resources would weaken the attendance comparison.”
Choosing a community project
Why do they want to know how visitors heard about the events?
- They need to check that visitors heard about both events at the library.
- They want to choose one advertising channel for the winning project.
- Publicity could affect turnout independently of interest.
- They regard lower attendance as direct evidence of weaker interest.
解答と解説を開く
Publicity could affect turnout independently of interest.
根拠: “And we should ask visitors where they heard about the event. A smaller turnout could reflect weaker publicity rather than a lack of interest.” 別の要因でも結果を説明できるため、結果だけでは原因を断定できません。 根拠に合う答え: “Publicity could affect turnout independently of interest.”
Choosing a community project
What is one reason for using both paper and online surveys?
- To check whether gardening club members signed the original list twice.
- To obtain a broader picture, including people who could not attend.
- To compare only the opinions of people who attended an event.
- To make the survey results fully representative of every resident.
解答と解説を開く
To obtain a broader picture, including people who could not attend.
根拠: “Right. We also need to hear from people who couldn't attend. Saturday mornings don't suit everyone.” “So an event plus a short survey, with paper copies at the library as well as an online version?” “Yes. That won't remove every bias, but it should give us a broader picture than the signatures we have now.” 発言の限定を保ちます。絶対的な保証ではありません。 根拠に合う答え: “To obtain a broader picture, including people who could not attend.”
Choosing a community project
What will Nora tell the applicants now?
- The garden has won the annual grant.
- Both groups have been promised full annual funding.
- They are being invited to run small pilot events.
- The council has cancelled both proposals.
解答と解説を開く
They are being invited to run small pilot events.
根拠: “I'll tell the applicants we're inviting small pilot events, not awarding the annual grant yet. Should we mention which project we prefer?” 話し手が実際に行うと述べた次の行動を選びます。 根拠に合う答え: “They are being invited to run small pilot events.”
Choosing a community project
Which statement best describes their final decision?
- They will decide entirely on the highest attendance.
- They will spend the entire budget on the pilot events.
- They have selected a winner but will not announce it.
- They will gather comparable evidence before choosing a winner.
解答と解説を開く
They will gather comparable evidence before choosing a winner.
根拠: “I like that, as long as we set the same spending limit for both. Otherwise attendance would be a poor comparison.” “Yes. That won't remove every bias, but it should give us a broader picture than the signatures we have now.” “Let's not. We've identified questions, not a winner. We'll compare the evidence after both events and keep part of the budget aside for running costs.” 細部ではなく、話し手が何を実現しようとしているかを捉えます。 根拠に合う答え: “They will gather comparable evidence before choosing a winner.”