Choisir un projet de quartier

Indice: “The support matters, but signatures alone don't tell us who would actually use it. Most were collected at the gardening club, which already meets nearby.” Le lieu de collecte peut limiter les personnes représentées par les réponses. Réponse étayée: “The signatures may mainly reflect an existing interested group.”

Indice: “It might. However, their budget covers tools and rent but leaves out insurance. We shouldn't treat it as a cheaper option until we know the full cost.” Compare les coûts complets, y compris la dépense omise. Réponse étayée: “Its budget leaves out insurance.”

Indice: “Exactly. I'd rather see a modest plan with reliable cover than an impressive launch that nobody can maintain.” Le contraste révèle ce que la personne privilégie. Réponse étayée: “A plan that can be maintained reliably.”

Indice: “I like that, as long as we set the same spending limit for both. Otherwise attendance would be a poor comparison.” Un budget égal contrôle une différence, sans garantir des résultats identiques ou sans biais. Réponse étayée: “Different resources would weaken the attendance comparison.”

Indice: “And we should ask visitors where they heard about the event. A smaller turnout could reflect weaker publicity rather than a lack of interest.” Un autre facteur peut expliquer le résultat ; celui-ci ne prouve pas à lui seul la cause proposée. Réponse étayée: “Publicity could affect turnout independently of interest.”

Indice: “Right. We also need to hear from people who couldn't attend. Saturday mornings don't suit everyone.” “So an event plus a short survey, with paper copies at the library as well as an online version?” “Yes. That won't remove every bias, but it should give us a broader picture than the signatures we have now.” Respecte la réserve exprimée : ce n’est pas une garantie absolue. Réponse étayée: “To obtain a broader picture, including people who could not attend.”

Indice: “I'll tell the applicants we're inviting small pilot events, not awarding the annual grant yet. Should we mention which project we prefer?” Retiens la prochaine action à laquelle la personne s’engage. Réponse étayée: “They are being invited to run small pilot events.”

Indice: “I like that, as long as we set the same spending limit for both. Otherwise attendance would be a poor comparison.” “Yes. That won't remove every bias, but it should give us a broader picture than the signatures we have now.” “Let's not. We've identified questions, not a winner. We'll compare the evidence after both events and keep part of the budget aside for running costs.” Identifie ce que les personnes cherchent à faire, plutôt qu’un détail secondaire. Réponse étayée: “They will gather comparable evidence before choosing a winner.”