明示された詳細・理由・条件と許可
問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。 実際に示された理由を使います。文外のもっともらしい理由だけでは足りません。 示された条件・許可を保ちます。規則だけでは出来事が実際に起きたとは言えません。
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
B2
観光と暮らしのある街
このレッスンについて
観光と暮らしのある街 · B2. 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
オリジナルの英文を読み、根拠を基に答えましょう。レベルは編集上の目安で、認定結果ではありません。
12 問
保存するとマイコレクションで見返せます。
This fictional briefing concerns a proposed visitor scheme in the invented town of Alderhaven.
The old riverside quarter attracts visitors partly because it remains a working neighbourhood. Shops serve residents as well as tourists, and the narrow lanes connect homes, a school and small workshops. The council’s proposal should therefore be judged not only by whether more people visit, but by whether ordinary life can continue alongside them.
The first measure would move large tour-group meeting points from the central square to a courtyard near the river path. The aim is to reduce the periods when several groups block the same crossing. The proposal does not prohibit individual visitors from entering the square, nor does it require every group to follow a single route. Guides would be asked to begin at staggered times, with the effect reviewed after one season.
A second measure concerns delivery access. Residents have reported vans stopping across doorways, while shopkeepers point out that supplies cannot arrive by bicycle in every case. The current draft reserves an early delivery window, but several businesses have explained that their suppliers serve a wider region and cannot guarantee that time. The briefing recommends discussions with suppliers before the window is finalised. A rule that looks orderly on a map may shift costs onto people who had little opportunity to shape it.
The suggested visitor information also needs revision. It describes the quarter as “unchanged for centuries”, a phrase that ignores the changes residents have made to keep their homes usable. Preserving historic buildings does not mean asking people to live as exhibits. Information should explain adaptation as part of the area’s history, rather than presenting all modern features as damage to authenticity.
Monitoring must include more than counts at the river entrance. A fall in complaints, for instance, could mean fewer obstructions, but it could also reflect residents’ loss of confidence that reporting helps. Short interviews and direct observations would provide context for the numbers. Likewise, an increase in visitor spending would not establish that all local businesses benefited equally.
The briefing supports a trial with published review dates and a clear way to amend the arrangements. It advises against advertising the scheme as a completed solution before those reviews occur. Tourism may help support the quarter’s economy, but that possibility does not settle every conflict over space, timing and representation. The proposal’s credibility will depend on whether residents and businesses can see their practical knowledge influencing decisions, not simply appearing in a consultation photograph.
まずはポイントを確認
要点・手がかりからの推論・根拠の限界・主張の適用
文章全体で判断します。正しい細部がそのまま要点とは限りません。 実際の手がかりを組み合わせ、裏付けのない事実を足しません。 根拠のある主張と不明なことを分けます。記載がないだけでは存在しないと証明できません。 示された主張とその限界に行動を照らし合わせます。
The whole message is about a change of plan.
学習素材
This fictional briefing concerns a proposed visitor scheme in the invented town of Alderhaven.
The old riverside quarter attracts visitors partly because it remains a working neighbourhood. Shops serve residents as well as tourists, and the narrow lanes connect homes, a school and small workshops. The council’s proposal should therefore be judged not only by whether more people visit, but by whether ordinary life can continue alongside them.
The first measure would move large tour-group meeting points from the central square to a courtyard near the river path. The aim is to reduce the periods when several groups block the same crossing. The proposal does not prohibit individual visitors from entering the square, nor does it require every group to follow a single route. Guides would be asked to begin at staggered times, with the effect reviewed after one season.
A second measure concerns delivery access. Residents have reported vans stopping across doorways, while shopkeepers point out that supplies cannot arrive by bicycle in every case. The current draft reserves an early delivery window, but several businesses have explained that their suppliers serve a wider region and cannot guarantee that time. The briefing recommends discussions with suppliers before the window is finalised. A rule that looks orderly on a map may shift costs onto people who had little opportunity to shape it.
The suggested visitor information also needs revision. It describes the quarter as “unchanged for centuries”, a phrase that ignores the changes residents have made to keep their homes usable. Preserving historic buildings does not mean asking people to live as exhibits. Information should explain adaptation as part of the area’s history, rather than presenting all modern features as damage to authenticity.
Monitoring must include more than counts at the river entrance. A fall in complaints, for instance, could mean fewer obstructions, but it could also reflect residents’ loss of confidence that reporting helps. Short interviews and direct observations would provide context for the numbers. Likewise, an increase in visitor spending would not establish that all local businesses benefited equally.
The briefing supports a trial with published review dates and a clear way to amend the arrangements. It advises against advertising the scheme as a completed solution before those reviews occur. Tourism may help support the quarter’s economy, but that possibility does not settle every conflict over space, timing and representation. The proposal’s credibility will depend on whether residents and businesses can see their practical knowledge influencing decisions, not simply appearing in a consultation photograph.
01 / 12D01保存するとマイコレクションで見返せます。
Tourism and a living neighbourhood
What is criticised in the phrase “unchanged for centuries”?
学習ルート
01
ステップ 1 · ウォームアップ
0/3ウォームアップ
02
ステップ 2 · 理解を深める
0/1明示された詳細
問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.03
ステップ 3 · 理解を深める
0/1明示された詳細・理由・条件と許可
問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。 実際に示された理由を使います。文外のもっともらしい理由だけでは足りません。 示された条件・許可を保ちます。規則だけでは出来事が実際に起きたとは言えません。
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.04
ステップ 4 · 理解を深める
0/2要点・手がかりからの推論・根拠の限界・主張の適用
文章全体で判断します。正しい細部がそのまま要点とは限りません。 実際の手がかりを組み合わせ、裏付けのない事実を足しません。 根拠のある主張と不明なことを分けます。記載がないだけでは存在しないと証明できません。 示された主張とその限界に行動を照らし合わせます。
The whole message is about a change of plan.05
ステップ 5 · 関連練習
0/3関連練習
06
ステップ 6 · 教材チャレンジ
0/2教材チャレンジ
この単元の復習ノート
0間違いを、次の一歩に。
初回答を残し、根拠を確かめて別の問題に挑戦します。同じ教材での正解は、新しい文章への応用を証明するものではありません。
まだ復習ノートはありません。まずは短いウォームアップを。
学習マップ
B2観光と暮らしのある街
この単元のポイント
明示された詳細・理由・条件と許可
問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。 実際に示された理由を使います。文外のもっともらしい理由だけでは足りません。 示された条件・許可を保ちます。規則だけでは出来事が実際に起きたとは言えません。
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.要点・手がかりからの推論・根拠の限界・主張の適用
文章全体で判断します。正しい細部がそのまま要点とは限りません。 実際の手がかりを組み合わせ、裏付けのない事実を足しません。 根拠のある主張と不明なことを分けます。記載がないだけでは存在しないと証明できません。 示された主張とその限界に行動を照らし合わせます。
The whole message is about a change of plan.問題と解答
解答を開くと、その問題にヒント利用が記録されます。
Tourism and a living neighbourhood
What is criticised in the phrase “unchanged for centuries”?
- It overlooks residents’ adaptations to make homes usable.
- It replaces the buildings’ actual history with incorrect construction dates.
- It implies that recent tourism is the sole cause of changes to the homes.
- It gives residents’ recent adaptations too prominent a place in the account.
解答と解説を開く
It overlooks residents’ adaptations to make homes usable.
根拠に合う答えは「It overlooks residents’ adaptations to make homes usable.」です。 根拠：「a phrase that ignores the changes residents have made to keep their homes usable.」。 別の選択肢「It replaces the buildings’ actual history with incorrect construction dates.」と比べてみましょう。 測定・報告された結果を、別の結果に置き換えています。 別の選択肢「It gives residents’ recent adaptations too prominent a place in the account.」と比べてみましょう。 本文に示された関係を逆にしています。
Tourism and a living neighbourhood
Why move large-group meeting points?
- To make every tour group follow an identical route through the quarter.
- To reserve the courtyard for residents rather than tourist groups.
- To reduce repeated blockages at a crossing.
- To keep individual visitors away from the central crossing throughout the day.
解答と解説を開く
To reduce repeated blockages at a crossing.
根拠に合う答えは「To reduce repeated blockages at a crossing.」です。 根拠：「reduce the periods when several groups block the same crossing.」。 別の選択肢「To keep individual visitors away from the central crossing throughout the day.」と比べてみましょう。 限定付きの結果を、例外のない主張に広げています。 別の選択肢「To make every tour group follow an identical route through the quarter.」と比べてみましょう。 限定付きの結果を、例外のない主張に広げています。
Tourism and a living neighbourhood
Why is an early delivery window questioned?
- Residents prefer suppliers to unload directly across their doorways.
- The draft has not yet been seen by any of the affected businesses.
- Shopkeepers agree that bicycles can replace every delivery van.
- Some regional suppliers cannot guarantee that arrival time.
解答と解説を開く
Some regional suppliers cannot guarantee that arrival time.
根拠に合う答えは「Some regional suppliers cannot guarantee that arrival time.」です。 根拠：「their suppliers serve a wider region and cannot guarantee that time.」。 別の選択肢「Residents prefer suppliers to unload directly across their doorways.」と比べてみましょう。 特徴や行動を、別の集団や話者に割り当てています。 別の選択肢「The draft has not yet been seen by any of the affected businesses.」と比べてみましょう。 本文に示された関係を逆にしています。
Tourism and a living neighbourhood
What would guides be asked to vary?
- The meeting point for every individual visitor.
- The window during which suppliers must deliver goods.
- The permitted length of each visit to a shop.
- Their starting times.
解答と解説を開く
Their starting times.
根拠に合う答えは「Their starting times.」です。 根拠：「Guides would be asked to begin at staggered times」。 別の選択肢「The meeting point for every individual visitor.」と比べてみましょう。 測定・報告された結果を、別の結果に置き換えています。 別の選択肢「The permitted length of each visit to a shop.」と比べてみましょう。 測定・報告された結果を、別の結果に置き換えています。
Tourism and a living neighbourhood
What should happen before the delivery window is finalised?
- Reviewing the first season’s results before consulting affected suppliers.
- Discussions with suppliers.
- Requiring suppliers serving other towns to change their entire regional route.
- Announcing the early window as the scheme’s completed solution.
解答と解説を開く
Discussions with suppliers.
根拠に合う答えは「Discussions with suppliers.」です。 根拠：「discussions with suppliers before the window is finalised.」。 別の選択肢「Announcing the early window as the scheme’s completed solution.」と比べてみましょう。 本文が求める追加の根拠や対策がそろう前に、行動を勧めています。 別の選択肢「Requiring suppliers serving other towns to change their entire regional route.」と比べてみましょう。 限定付きの結果を、例外のない主張に広げています。
Tourism and a living neighbourhood
What is the proposed scheme’s broader test according to the briefing?
- Whether daily neighbourhood life can continue alongside tourism.
- Whether increased visitor spending offsets any change in ordinary life.
- Whether the information makes modern adaptations invisible to tourists.
- Whether shops can replace their ordinary resident customers with visitors.
解答と解説を開く
Whether daily neighbourhood life can continue alongside tourism.
根拠に合う答えは「Whether daily neighbourhood life can continue alongside tourism.」です。 根拠：「whether ordinary life can continue alongside them.」。 別の選択肢「Whether the information makes modern adaptations invisible to tourists.」と比べてみましょう。 補助的な例や具体的な細部を、問われている主目的と取り違えています。 別の選択肢「Whether shops can replace their ordinary resident customers with visitors.」と比べてみましょう。 特徴や行動を、別の集団や話者に割り当てています。
Tourism and a living neighbourhood
What does “asking people to live as exhibits” warn against?
- Including changes to people’s homes in the account of local history.
- Treating protection of historic buildings as incompatible with residential use.
- Letting residents explain how they have adapted buildings for current use.
- Treating residents’ living conditions as a display that must stay frozen.
解答と解説を開く
Treating residents’ living conditions as a display that must stay frozen.
根拠に合う答えは「Treating residents’ living conditions as a display that must stay frozen.」です。 根拠：「Preserving historic buildings does not mean asking people to live as exhibits.」。 別の選択肢「Treating protection of historic buildings as incompatible with residential use.」と比べてみましょう。 限定付きの結果を、例外のない主張に広げています。 別の選択肢「Including changes to people’s homes in the account of local history.」と比べてみましょう。 本文に示された関係を逆にしています。
Tourism and a living neighbourhood
Why might fewer complaints be an uncertain sign of success?
- Residents’ confidence in reporting must have increased with the lower total.
- Complaints are too subjective to have any connection to obstructions.
- A reduction establishes that crossing problems have been eliminated.
- Residents might have stopped believing that reporting helps.
解答と解説を開く
Residents might have stopped believing that reporting helps.
根拠に合う答えは「Residents might have stopped believing that reporting helps.」です。 根拠：「it could also reflect residents’ loss of confidence that reporting helps.」。 別の選択肢「Complaints are too subjective to have any connection to obstructions.」と比べてみましょう。 限定付きの結果を、例外のない主張に広げています。 別の選択肢「A reduction establishes that crossing problems have been eliminated.」と比べてみましょう。 この根拠から言える確実さや適用範囲を超えています。
Tourism and a living neighbourhood
What would help interpret the numerical monitoring?
- Visitor counts alone at one entrance.
- Treating the total increase in spending as proof of an equal benefit to shops.
- Publishing a consultation photograph as evidence that concerns shaped the plan.
- Interviews and direct observations.
解答と解説を開く
Interviews and direct observations.
根拠に合う答えは「Interviews and direct observations.」です。 根拠：「Short interviews and direct observations would provide context for the numbers.」。 別の選択肢「Visitor counts alone at one entrance.」と比べてみましょう。 本文が求める幅広い評価を、単独の指標で代用しています。 別の選択肢「Publishing a consultation photograph as evidence that concerns shaped the plan.」と比べてみましょう。 利用可能であること・完了したこと・文書があることを、実際の質の十分な証拠としています。
Tourism and a living neighbourhood
What cannot be concluded merely from higher visitor spending?
- That every local business gained equally.
- That spending figures may form part of the review.
- That economic activity is one aspect relevant to the scheme.
- That visitor purchases made a contribution to recorded spending.
解答と解説を開く
That every local business gained equally.
根拠に合う答えは「That every local business gained equally.」です。 根拠：「an increase in visitor spending would not establish that all local businesses benefited equally.」。 別の選択肢「That visitor purchases made a contribution to recorded spending.」と比べてみましょう。 この記述自体は本文と矛盾しません。ただし問われているのは、否定・回避される主張、または根拠からは言えない主張です。 別の選択肢「That economic activity is one aspect relevant to the scheme.」と比べてみましょう。 この記述自体は本文と矛盾しません。ただし問われているのは、否定・回避される主張、または根拠からは言えない主張です。
Tourism and a living neighbourhood
What does the briefing want included in a trial?
- Keeping consultation separate from the decisions made after review.
- Advertising the first season as confirmation that the proposal has solved the problem.
- Published review dates and a way to change arrangements.
- Leaving the initial arrangement unchanged so the advertising remains consistent.
解答と解説を開く
Published review dates and a way to change arrangements.
根拠に合う答えは「Published review dates and a way to change arrangements.」です。 根拠：「a trial with published review dates and a clear way to amend the arrangements.」。 別の選択肢「Advertising the first season as confirmation that the proposal has solved the problem.」と比べてみましょう。 本文が求める追加の根拠や対策がそろう前に、行動を勧めています。 別の選択肢「Keeping consultation separate from the decisions made after review.」と比べてみましょう。 本文に示された関係を逆にしています。
Tourism and a living neighbourhood
What would make the proposal credible to the writer?
- Using entrance counts to demonstrate success even if neighbourhood difficulties remain.
- Residents appearing in a photograph without influencing the plan.
- Calling the scheme complete before review.
- Practical local knowledge visibly affecting decisions.
解答と解説を開く
Practical local knowledge visibly affecting decisions.
根拠に合う答えは「Practical local knowledge visibly affecting decisions.」です。 根拠：「residents and businesses can see their practical knowledge influencing decisions」。 別の選択肢「Calling the scheme complete before review.」と比べてみましょう。 本文が求める追加の根拠や対策がそろう前に、行動を勧めています。 別の選択肢「Residents appearing in a photograph without influencing the plan.」と比べてみましょう。 利用可能であること・完了したこと・文書があることを、実際の質の十分な証拠としています。