例が支える主張・明示された詳細
例が支える点を確認し、すべての場合の証明に広げません。 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
One successful repair shows that this item was repairable; it does not prove every item can be repaired.
B2
批評的なレビュー
このレッスンについて
批評的なレビュー · B2. 例が支える点を確認し、すべての場合の証明に広げません。 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
オリジナルの英文を読み、根拠を基に答えましょう。レベルは編集上の目安で、認定結果ではありません。
8 問
保存するとマイコレクションで見返せます。
In the fictional documentary Borrowed Streets, filmmaker Leila North follows three residents during the redesign of a town square. A shopkeeper worries about deliveries, a cyclist wants safer crossings, and a teenager hopes for somewhere to sit without being expected to buy anything. The film is strongest when it allows these concerns to overlap. The shopkeeper, for example, also wants a safer route for her child. Such moments resist the easy division of residents into opposing camps. North’s camera stays close to individual experiences. We hear a delivery driver explain why a proposed loading area would add ten minutes to each stop, and we watch a wheelchair user attempt a temporary ramp. These scenes make the consequences of design decisions concrete. However, the film gives little information about how representative its participants are. It is possible to care deeply about their difficulties while still wanting to know what other residents think. The editing creates a further problem. A tense public meeting is followed immediately by a scene of construction work, encouraging the impression that objections were ignored. Only later does a caption reveal that six months separated the two events. The sequence is emotionally effective but leaves the decision-making process unclear. Access to that process would have strengthened the film’s central concern with public participation. Despite these weaknesses, Borrowed Streets avoids pretending that one design can satisfy everyone. Its ending shows a square that is more accessible in some respects and still inconvenient in others. Viewers seeking a technical guide to town planning will need additional sources. Those interested in how public spaces shape everyday dignity will find thoughtful material, provided they remain alert to the gaps between a compelling personal story and a complete account of a policy decision.
まずはポイントを確認
明示された詳細
問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
要点・根拠の限界
文章全体で判断します。正しい細部がそのまま要点とは限りません。 根拠のある主張と不明なことを分けます。記載がないだけでは存在しないと証明できません。
The whole message is about a change of plan.
学習素材
In the fictional documentary Borrowed Streets, filmmaker Leila North follows three residents during the redesign of a town square. A shopkeeper worries about deliveries, a cyclist wants safer crossings, and a teenager hopes for somewhere to sit without being expected to buy anything. The film is strongest when it allows these concerns to overlap. The shopkeeper, for example, also wants a safer route for her child. Such moments resist the easy division of residents into opposing camps. North’s camera stays close to individual experiences. We hear a delivery driver explain why a proposed loading area would add ten minutes to each stop, and we watch a wheelchair user attempt a temporary ramp. These scenes make the consequences of design decisions concrete. However, the film gives little information about how representative its participants are. It is possible to care deeply about their difficulties while still wanting to know what other residents think. The editing creates a further problem. A tense public meeting is followed immediately by a scene of construction work, encouraging the impression that objections were ignored. Only later does a caption reveal that six months separated the two events. The sequence is emotionally effective but leaves the decision-making process unclear. Access to that process would have strengthened the film’s central concern with public participation. Despite these weaknesses, Borrowed Streets avoids pretending that one design can satisfy everyone. Its ending shows a square that is more accessible in some respects and still inconvenient in others. Viewers seeking a technical guide to town planning will need additional sources. Those interested in how public spaces shape everyday dignity will find thoughtful material, provided they remain alert to the gaps between a compelling personal story and a complete account of a policy decision.
01 / 8D01保存するとマイコレクションで見返せます。
A film that asks more than it answers
What does the shopkeeper’s concern for her child demonstrate?
学習ルート
01
ステップ 1 · ウォームアップ
0/2ウォームアップ
02
ステップ 2 · 理解を深める
0/1例が支える主張・明示された詳細
例が支える点を確認し、すべての場合の証明に広げません。 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
One successful repair shows that this item was repairable; it does not prove every item can be repaired.03
ステップ 3 · 理解を深める
0/1要点・根拠の限界
文章全体で判断します。正しい細部がそのまま要点とは限りません。 根拠のある主張と不明なことを分けます。記載がないだけでは存在しないと証明できません。
The whole message is about a change of plan.04
ステップ 4 · 関連練習
0/2関連練習
05
ステップ 5 · 教材チャレンジ
0/2教材チャレンジ
この単元の復習ノート
0間違いを、次の一歩に。
初回答を残し、根拠を確かめて別の問題に挑戦します。同じ教材での正解は、新しい文章への応用を証明するものではありません。
まだ復習ノートはありません。まずは短いウォームアップを。
学習マップ
B2批評的なレビュー
この単元のポイント
例が支える主張・明示された詳細
例が支える点を確認し、すべての場合の証明に広げません。 問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
One successful repair shows that this item was repairable; it does not prove every item can be repaired.明示された詳細
問われた人・時刻・場所・量を正しい出来事に結び付けます。
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.要点・根拠の限界
文章全体で判断します。正しい細部がそのまま要点とは限りません。 根拠のある主張と不明なことを分けます。記載がないだけでは存在しないと証明できません。
The whole message is about a change of plan.問題と解答
解答を開くと、その問題にヒント利用が記録されます。
A film that asks more than it answers
What does the shopkeeper’s concern for her child demonstrate?
- Having children should give residents greater authority in planning.
- A person’s business role determines their view on safer crossings.
- Concern for safety means the shopkeeper’s delivery worries are unimportant.
- Residents’ interests can overlap across apparent divisions.
解答と解説を開く
Residents’ interests can overlap across apparent divisions.
根拠に合う答えは「Residents’ interests can overlap across apparent divisions.」です。 根拠：「Such moments resist the easy division of residents into opposing camps.」。 別の選択肢「A person’s business role determines their view on safer crossings.」と比べてみましょう。 話者・筆者が退けている二者択一に、議論を単純化しています。 別の選択肢「Having children should give residents greater authority in planning.」と比べてみましょう。 判断の基準として明示されたものを、別の基準に置き換えています。
A film that asks more than it answers
What information is missing about the featured residents?
- Which competing concerns the film’s main participants express.
- Whether the shopkeeper combines delivery and family concerns.
- How each participant’s concerns affect daily use of the square.
- How representative they are of the wider community.
解答と解説を開く
How representative they are of the wider community.
根拠に合う答えは「How representative they are of the wider community.」です。 根拠：「little information about how representative its participants are.」。 別の選択肢「How each participant’s concerns affect daily use of the square.」と比べてみましょう。 これはすでに得られていた情報です。問われているのは不足していた情報です。 本文の表現「These scenes make the consequences of design decisions concrete.」を、問いと主張「How each participant’s concerns affect daily use of the square.」に照らして確認しましょう。 別の選択肢「Which competing concerns the film’s main participants express.」と比べてみましょう。 これはすでに得られていた情報です。問われているのは不足していた情報です。 本文の表現「A shopkeeper worries about deliveries, a cyclist wants safer crossings, and a teenager hopes for somewhere to sit without being expected to buy anything.」を、問いと主張「Which competing concerns the film’s main participants express.」に照らして確認しましょう。
A film that asks more than it answers
How long separated the meeting and construction scenes?
- Three months.
- Ten months.
- Six months.
- The following day.
解答と解説を開く
Six months.
根拠に合う答えは「Six months.」です。 根拠：「six months separated the two events.」。 別の選択肢「Ten months.」と比べてみましょう。 実際に出た、またはありそうな数字・時刻・期間を、別の出来事に結び付けています。 別の選択肢「Three months.」と比べてみましょう。 実際に出た、またはありそうな数字・時刻・期間を、別の出来事に結び付けています。
A film that asks more than it answers
What is the reviewer’s overall judgement?
- The editing weaknesses outweigh any value in the residents’ stories.
- The redesigned square resolves the competing concerns it presents.
- The individual experiences provide a sufficiently complete account of planning policy.
- The film is thoughtful but incomplete as a policy account.
解答と解説を開く
The film is thoughtful but incomplete as a policy account.
根拠に合う答えは「The film is thoughtful but incomplete as a policy account.」です。 根拠：「a compelling personal story and a complete account of a policy decision.」。 別の選択肢「The individual experiences provide a sufficiently complete account of planning policy.」と比べてみましょう。 この根拠から言える確実さや適用範囲を超えています。 別の選択肢「The editing weaknesses outweigh any value in the residents’ stories.」と比べてみましょう。 限界があることを、貢献全体を捨てる理由にしています。有用性と限界は区別されます。
A film that asks more than it answers
Which scene makes an access problem concrete?
- A wheelchair user attempting a temporary ramp.
- A technical plan comparing alternative ramp gradients.
- A delivery driver attempting to use a crossing on a bicycle.
- A caption explaining how access affected the six-month timetable.
解答と解説を開く
A wheelchair user attempting a temporary ramp.
根拠に合う答えは「A wheelchair user attempting a temporary ramp.」です。 根拠：「we watch a wheelchair user attempt a temporary ramp.」。 別の選択肢「A caption explaining how access affected the six-month timetable.」と比べてみましょう。 本文にない具体的な情報を付け足しています。もっともらしさは本文の根拠ではありません。 別の選択肢「A technical plan comparing alternative ramp gradients.」と比べてみましょう。 本文にない具体的な情報を付け足しています。もっともらしさは本文の根拠ではありません。
A film that asks more than it answers
What misleading impression may the editing create?
- That construction followed immediately despite objections.
- That the public meeting was held only after the square had reopened.
- That residents had no opportunity to raise objections at a public meeting.
- That the meeting led to an immediate suspension of construction.
解答と解説を開く
That construction followed immediately despite objections.
根拠に合う答えは「That construction followed immediately despite objections.」です。 根拠：「encouraging the impression that objections were ignored.」。 別の選択肢「That the public meeting was held only after the square had reopened.」と比べてみましょう。 初期の状況と、その後の検証・決定という二つの段階を混同しています。 別の選択肢「That residents had no opportunity to raise objections at a public meeting.」と比べてみましょう。 限定付きの結果を、例外のない主張に広げています。
A film that asks more than it answers
Who would particularly need sources beyond the film?
- A viewer seeking a technical town-planning guide.
- A viewer considering the effect of public space on daily dignity.
- A viewer interested in the experiences of the people interviewed.
- A viewer exploring how residents’ concerns overlap.
解答と解説を開く
A viewer seeking a technical town-planning guide.
根拠に合う答えは「A viewer seeking a technical town-planning guide.」です。 根拠：「Viewers seeking a technical guide to town planning will need additional sources.」。 別の選択肢「A viewer exploring how residents’ concerns overlap.」と比べてみましょう。 これらの関心は、映画がすでに扱う個人の経験や日常の尊厳に関わります。追加資料が必要だと明示されるのは、都市計画の技術的な手引きを求める場合です。 別の選択肢「A viewer interested in the experiences of the people interviewed.」と比べてみましょう。 これらの関心は、映画がすでに扱う個人の経験や日常の尊厳に関わります。追加資料が必要だと明示されるのは、都市計画の技術的な手引きを求める場合です。
A film that asks more than it answers
Which statement about the ending is supported?
- The remaining inconveniences mean access has not improved.
- The redesign removes the inconveniences described by the participants.
- The residents agree that the square should return to its previous design.
- The square improves some access while retaining inconveniences.
解答と解説を開く
The square improves some access while retaining inconveniences.
根拠に合う答えは「The square improves some access while retaining inconveniences.」です。 根拠：「more accessible in some respects and still inconvenient in others.」。 別の選択肢「The redesign removes the inconveniences described by the participants.」と比べてみましょう。 限定付きの結果を、例外のない主張に広げています。 別の選択肢「The remaining inconveniences mean access has not improved.」と比べてみましょう。 本文に示された関係を逆にしています。