Une photographie oubliée · B2. Reliez la personne, l’heure, le lieu ou la quantité à l’événement exact.
Lis le document original en anglais et appuie tes réponses sur des indices. Le niveau est un repère éditorial, pas un résultat certifié.
The photograph fell from a book I was packing for the charity shop. At first I recognised only the gate: two pale posts and a latch that had always caught on the sleeve of my coat. Then I saw my brother, small and unsmiling, standing beside our mother. Someone had cut the edge of the picture, removing most of the person whose hand rested on his shoulder.
I was certain I knew the day. It was the afternoon we had been told that we were leaving the house, and my brother had refused to speak because nobody had asked what he wanted. I had repeated that version of events so often that it felt less like a memory than a fact entered in a family record.
I sent him a photograph of the photograph. His reply arrived while I was still packing. “You have the wrong day,” he wrote. “That was before the school play. I was frightened of forgetting my lines.” He remembered the borrowed jacket, which itched, and our mother telling him not to pull at the collar. The departing house and the silent protest belonged to another afternoon.
For a moment, I wanted to defend my account. The expression on his face seemed to support it. Then I noticed the paper flower pinned to his jacket, a detail I had previously treated as an unimportant blur. It did not prove every part of his story, but it fitted a school performance more comfortably than a sudden announcement about moving.
I asked about the missing person at the edge. He thought it was our aunt, though he was not certain. I had assumed it was me. Neither of us could explain why the photograph had been cut. We agreed to ask our cousin, who still had some of our aunt’s albums, rather than invent a reason that happened to suit us.
That evening, I put the photograph in a new envelope and wrote both accounts on a sheet of paper. I marked mine as a memory I was now questioning, not one I had proved false in every detail. My brother’s recollection deserved attention without being promoted automatically into a complete record.
The book continued into the donation box. The photograph stayed. It had become more interesting after it stopped illustrating the story I thought I knew. I no longer looked at my brother’s expression and saw a single obvious explanation. The unfamiliar space around it was not an empty place to fill quickly, but a reason to look again.
Retrouvez la personne, l’objet ou l’idée que le mot reprend dans la phrase. Reliez la personne, l’heure, le lieu ou la quantité à l’événement exact. Retenez la raison donnée ; une cause plausible mais extérieure au texte ne suffit pas.
In “Mia lost her key”, her refers to Mia.
Reliez la personne, l’heure, le lieu ou la quantité à l’événement exact. Combinez les indices réels sans ajouter un fait non étayé.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
The photograph fell from a book I was packing for the charity shop. At first I recognised only the gate: two pale posts and a latch that had always caught on the sleeve of my coat. Then I saw my brother, small and unsmiling, standing beside our mother. Someone had cut the edge of the picture, removing most of the person whose hand rested on his shoulder.
I was certain I knew the day. It was the afternoon we had been told that we were leaving the house, and my brother had refused to speak because nobody had asked what he wanted. I had repeated that version of events so often that it felt less like a memory than a fact entered in a family record.
I sent him a photograph of the photograph. His reply arrived while I was still packing. “You have the wrong day,” he wrote. “That was before the school play. I was frightened of forgetting my lines.” He remembered the borrowed jacket, which itched, and our mother telling him not to pull at the collar. The departing house and the silent protest belonged to another afternoon.
For a moment, I wanted to defend my account. The expression on his face seemed to support it. Then I noticed the paper flower pinned to his jacket, a detail I had previously treated as an unimportant blur. It did not prove every part of his story, but it fitted a school performance more comfortably than a sudden announcement about moving.
I asked about the missing person at the edge. He thought it was our aunt, though he was not certain. I had assumed it was me. Neither of us could explain why the photograph had been cut. We agreed to ask our cousin, who still had some of our aunt’s albums, rather than invent a reason that happened to suit us.
That evening, I put the photograph in a new envelope and wrote both accounts on a sheet of paper. I marked mine as a memory I was now questioning, not one I had proved false in every detail. My brother’s recollection deserved attention without being promoted automatically into a complete record.
The book continued into the donation box. The photograph stayed. It had become more interesting after it stopped illustrating the story I thought I knew. I no longer looked at my brother’s expression and saw a single obvious explanation. The unfamiliar space around it was not an empty place to fill quickly, but a reason to look again.
A forgotten photograph
Retrouvez la personne, l’objet ou l’idée que le mot reprend dans la phrase. Reliez la personne, l’heure, le lieu ou la quantité à l’événement exact. Retenez la raison donnée ; une cause plausible mais extérieure au texte ne suffit pas.
In “Mia lost her key”, her refers to Mia.Reliez la personne, l’heure, le lieu ou la quantité à l’événement exact. Combinez les indices réels sans ajouter un fait non étayé.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.Reliez la personne, l’heure, le lieu ou la quantité à l’événement exact.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.Conservez la première réponse, vérifiez le passage et essayez une autre question. Une réussite sur le même document ne prouve pas le transfert à un nouveau texte.
Pas encore de notes. Essayez un court échauffement.
Retrouvez la personne, l’objet ou l’idée que le mot reprend dans la phrase. Reliez la personne, l’heure, le lieu ou la quantité à l’événement exact. Retenez la raison donnée ; une cause plausible mais extérieure au texte ne suffit pas.
In “Mia lost her key”, her refers to Mia.Reliez la personne, l’heure, le lieu ou la quantité à l’événement exact. Combinez les indices réels sans ajouter un fait non étayé.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.Ouvrir une réponse enregistre une aide pour cette question.
A forgotten photograph
La réponse étayée est « It fell from a book being packed for donation. ». Indice : « The photograph fell from a book I was packing for the charity shop. ». Comparez l’autre proposition : « It arrived with the brother’s account in a new envelope. ». Cela confond deux étapes : la situation initiale et une vérification ou décision ultérieure. Comparez l’autre proposition : « The narrator found it among albums already borrowed from the cousin. ». Cela confond deux étapes : la situation initiale et une vérification ou décision ultérieure.
A forgotten photograph
La réponse étayée est « The gate. ». Indice : « At first I recognised only the gate ». Comparez l’autre proposition : « The paper flower. ». Cela confond deux étapes : la situation initiale et une vérification ou décision ultérieure. Comparez l’autre proposition : « The identity of the person whose hand was visible. ». Cela ajoute un détail absent du document ; sa plausibilité ne constitue pas une preuve.
A forgotten photograph
La réponse étayée est « A protest about leaving the house. ». Indice : « It was the afternoon we had been told that we were leaving the house, and my brother had refused to speak because nobody had asked what he wanted. ». Comparez l’autre proposition : « Anger about an itchy borrowed jacket. ». Cela confond deux étapes : la situation initiale et une vérification ou décision ultérieure. Comparez l’autre proposition : « Reluctance to have a photograph taken before donating the book. ». Cela ajoute un détail absent du document ; sa plausibilité ne constitue pas une preuve.
A forgotten photograph
La réponse étayée est « Repetition had made the narrator’s version feel unquestionable. ». Indice : « I had repeated that version of events so often ». Comparez l’autre proposition : « The narrator had avoided repeating the family story before this discovery. ». Cela inverse la relation indiquée dans le document. Comparez l’autre proposition : « An independently checked family record had confirmed the date. ». Cela attribue aux preuves une certitude ou une portée plus grande que ce qu’elles permettent.
A forgotten photograph
La réponse étayée est « A school play. ». Indice : « That was before the school play. ». Comparez l’autre proposition : « An announcement that they were moving. ». Cela confond deux étapes : la situation initiale et une vérification ou décision ultérieure. Comparez l’autre proposition : « The day the book was first selected for donation. ». Cela confond deux étapes : la situation initiale et une vérification ou décision ultérieure.
A forgotten photograph
La réponse étayée est « It fits the brother’s account but does not prove all of it. ». Indice : « It did not prove every part of his story, but it fitted a school performance more comfortably ». Comparez l’autre proposition : « It makes the brother’s recollection a complete and independently verified record. ». Cela attribue aux preuves une certitude ou une portée plus grande que ce qu’elles permettent. Comparez l’autre proposition : « It is no more compatible with the play than with the moving announcement. ». Cela inverse la relation indiquée dans le document.
A forgotten photograph
La réponse étayée est « A paper flower pinned to the jacket. ». Indice : « the paper flower pinned to his jacket ». Comparez l’autre proposition : « The gate latch that had caught on the narrator’s coat. ». Cela confond deux étapes : la situation initiale et une vérification ou décision ultérieure. Comparez l’autre proposition : « The visible hand resting on the brother’s shoulder. ». La main est visible sur la photo, mais le récit n’en fait pas le détail qui provoque la remise en question ; ce rôle revient à la fleur. Examinez le passage « whose hand rested on his shoulder. » en tenant compte de la question et de l’affirmation « The visible hand resting on the brother’s shoulder. ».
A forgotten photograph
La réponse étayée est « Fear of forgetting his lines. ». Indice : « I was frightened of forgetting my lines. ». Comparez l’autre proposition : « Embarrassment that the photograph had been cut. ». Cela ajoute un détail absent du document ; sa plausibilité ne constitue pas une preuve. Comparez l’autre proposition : « Certainty that moving house was unfair. ». Cela confond deux étapes : la situation initiale et une vérification ou décision ultérieure.
A forgotten photograph
La réponse étayée est « Why the photograph was cut. ». Indice : « Neither of us could explain why the photograph had been cut. ». Comparez l’autre proposition : « Whether the flower was visible on the jacket. ». Ce détail est déjà établi dans le récit ; la question demande ce qui reste incertain. Comparez l’autre proposition : « Whether the brother connected the image with a school play. ». Ce détail est déjà établi dans le récit ; la question demande ce qui reste incertain.
A forgotten photograph
La réponse étayée est « The cousin may have further evidence in the aunt’s albums. ». Indice : « our cousin, who still had some of our aunt’s albums ». Comparez l’autre proposition : « They hope the cousin will choose the more comforting account without more evidence. ». Cela inverse la relation indiquée dans le document. Comparez l’autre proposition : « They believe the cousin has already identified the missing person with certainty. ». Cela attribue aux preuves une certitude ou une portée plus grande que ce qu’elles permettent.
A forgotten photograph
La réponse étayée est « By writing both down and qualifying the certainty of each. ». Indice : « That evening, I put the photograph in a new envelope and wrote both accounts on a sheet of paper. I marked mine as a memory I was now questioning, not one I had proved false in every detail. My brother’s recollection deserved attention without being promoted automatically into a complete record. ». Comparez l’autre proposition : « By marking the narrator’s whole account as conclusively false. ». Cela transforme un constat nuancé en une affirmation sans exception. Comparez l’autre proposition : « By presenting the brother’s version as a complete official record. ». Cela attribue aux preuves une certitude ou une portée plus grande que ce qu’elles permettent.
A forgotten photograph
La réponse étayée est « The narrator accepts uncertainty as a reason for further attention. ». Indice : « I no longer looked at my brother’s expression and saw a single obvious explanation. The unfamiliar space around it was not an empty place to fill quickly, but a reason to look again. ». Comparez l’autre proposition : « The narrator treats the competing accounts as proof that photographs cannot offer evidence. ». Cela transforme un constat nuancé en une affirmation sans exception. Comparez l’autre proposition : « The narrator accepts the brother’s account as the only explanation worth considering. ». Cela inverse la relation indiquée dans le document.