動詞の構造を確認する
動詞の形を選ぶ前に、主語、時の基準、助動詞を確認します。
Had the library [1] _____ only on volunteers’ memories, many dates would have remained uncertain.
デジタル資料庫の構築 · B2. 動詞の形を選ぶ前に、主語、時の基準、助動詞を確認します。
オリジナルの英文にある十二の空欄を埋めましょう。前後と文章全体を読みます。レベルは編集上の目安です。
Had the library [1] _____ only on volunteers’ memories, many dates would have remained uncertain. Instead, its archive team agreed to take the limits of each source into [2] _____. By the time the public launch was announced, the team [3] _____ photographs for nine months.
The most [4] _____ discovery concerned a group of photographs that had been labelled incorrectly. [5] _____ the labels looked official, two independent records contradicted them. The archivist recommended [6] _____ both the original labels and the corrections in the database.
Her report placed particular emphasis [7] _____ explaining why each correction had been made. The team consulted a resident [8] _____ family had owned several of the photographs. Only after the evidence had been compared [9] _____ the team approve the revised dates.
The aim was to make uncertainty visible, [10] _____ than hide it behind confident descriptions. [11] _____ the ownership records, the archivist asked permission before making the images public. Had the team ignored those records, it [12] _____ images without the necessary permission.
動詞の形を選ぶ前に、主語、時の基準、助動詞を確認します。
Had the library [1] _____ only on volunteers’ memories, many dates would have remained uncertain.
空欄の前後を読み、冠詞、代名詞、前置詞、固定表現をまとまりとして確認します。
Instead, its archive team agreed to take the limits of each source into [2] _____.
原因、対比、条件、指示の関係を判断し、接続表現に必要な文法も確認します。
[5] _____ the labels looked official, two independent records contradicted them.
Had the library [1] _____ only on volunteers’ memories, many dates would have remained uncertain. Instead, its archive team agreed to take the limits of each source into [2] _____. By the time the public launch was announced, the team [3] _____ photographs for nine months.
The most [4] _____ discovery concerned a group of photographs that had been labelled incorrectly. [5] _____ the labels looked official, two independent records contradicted them. The archivist recommended [6] _____ both the original labels and the corrections in the database.
Her report placed particular emphasis [7] _____ explaining why each correction had been made. The team consulted a resident [8] _____ family had owned several of the photographs. Only after the evidence had been compared [9] _____ the team approve the revised dates.
The aim was to make uncertainty visible, [10] _____ than hide it behind confident descriptions. [11] _____ the ownership records, the archivist asked permission before making the images public. Had the team ignored those records, it [12] _____ images without the necessary permission.
Building a digital archive — gap 1
空欄の前後を読み、冠詞、代名詞、前置詞、固定表現をまとまりとして確認します。
Instead, its archive team agreed to take the limits of each source into [2] _____.原因、対比、条件、指示の関係を判断し、接続表現に必要な文法も確認します。
[5] _____ the labels looked official, two independent records contradicted them.動詞の形を選ぶ前に、主語、時の基準、助動詞を確認します。
Had the library [1] _____ only on volunteers’ memories, many dates would have remained uncertain.初回答を残し、変化の理由を理解して、別の場面で確かめます。
まだ復習ノートはありません。まずは短いウォームアップを。
動詞の形を選ぶ前に、主語、時の基準、助動詞を確認します。
Had the library [1] _____ only on volunteers’ memories, many dates would have remained uncertain.空欄の前後を読み、冠詞、代名詞、前置詞、固定表現をまとまりとして確認します。
Instead, its archive team agreed to take the limits of each source into [2] _____.原因、対比、条件、指示の関係を判断し、接続表現に必要な文法も確認します。
[5] _____ the labels looked official, two independent records contradicted them.解答を開くと、その問題にヒント利用が記録されます。
Building a digital archive — gap 1
判断の手掛かりは「Had the library [1] _____ only on volunteers’ memories, many dates would have remained uncertain.」です。Had+主語+過去分詞は過去の反事実条件を表すif節の倒置で、if ... had relied...の意味です。実際に頼ったと述べているわけではありません。 この課題で完成する文は「Had the library relied only on volunteers’ memories, many dates would have remained uncertain.」です。
Building a digital archive — gap 2
判断の手掛かりは「Instead, its archive team agreed to take the limits of each source into [2] _____.」です。take something into accountは判断の際に考慮する意味で、名詞accountがこの定型表現を完成させます。 この課題で完成する文は「Instead, its archive team agreed to take the limits of each source into account.」です。
Building a digital archive — gap 3
判断の手掛かりは「By the time the public launch was announced, the team [3] _____ photographs for nine months.」です。had been + -ing を用います。表す内容:過去の基準時まで続いた動作の期間や直前の動作の痕跡。 この課題で完成する文は「By the time the public launch was announced, the team had been scanning photographs for nine months.」です。
Building a digital archive — gap 4
判断の手掛かりは「The most [4] _____ discovery concerned a group of photographs that had been labelled incorrectly.」です。空欄は後ろの発見・改善を説明するため、the mostの後に形容詞significantを置きます。 この課題で完成する文は「The most significant discovery concerned a group of photographs that had been labelled incorrectly.」です。
Building a digital archive — gap 5
判断の手掛かりは「[5] _____ the labels looked official, two independent records contradicted them.」です。although/even though + finite clause を用います。表す内容:主語と時制のある動詞が続く譲歩。 この課題で完成する文は「Although the labels looked official, two independent records contradicted them.」です。
Building a digital archive — gap 6
判断の手掛かりは「The archivist recommended [6] _____ both the original labels and the corrections in the database.」です。propose/recommendに直接行為を続けるここでは-ing補語にします。計画されるのは行為そのもので、定形の時制や挿入されたto不定詞ではありません。 この課題で完成する文は「The archivist recommended including both the original labels and the corrections in the database.」です。
Building a digital archive — gap 7
判断の手掛かりは「Her report placed particular emphasis [7] _____ explaining why each correction had been made.」です。根拠ならbased on、強調点ならplace emphasis onという組み合わせで、完成文のonはその根拠・焦点を導きます。 この課題で完成する文は「Her report placed particular emphasis on explaining why each correction had been made.」です。
Building a digital archive — gap 8
判断の手掛かりは「The team consulted a resident [8] _____ family had owned several of the photographs.」です。関係節はwork・family・objectionsなど先行詞に関係する名詞で始まるので、その名詞を残してwhoseで所有・所属を示します。 この課題で完成する文は「The team consulted a resident whose family had owned several of the photographs.」です。
Building a digital archive — gap 9
判断の手掛かりは「Only after the evidence had been compared [9] _____ the team approve the revised dates.」です。only after/until + clause; inverted main clause を用います。表す内容:after・until の節内ではなく、主節を倒置する。 この課題で完成する文は「Only after the evidence had been compared did the team approve the revised dates.」です。
Building a digital archive — gap 10
判断の手掛かりは「The aim was to make uncertainty visible, [10] _____ than hide it behind confident descriptions.」です。rather thanは望まれる行為と退けられる選択肢を対比し、二つの行為は文法的に並行した役割になります。 この課題で完成する文は「The aim was to make uncertainty visible, rather than hide it behind confident descriptions.」です。
Building a digital archive — gap 11
判断の手掛かりは「[11] _____ the ownership records, the archivist asked permission before making the images public.」です。having + past participle を用います。表す内容:主節より前に明確に完了した動作。 この課題で完成する文は「Having examined the ownership records, the archivist asked permission before making the images public.」です。
Building a digital archive — gap 12
判断の手掛かりは「Had the team ignored those records, it [12] _____ images without the necessary permission.」です。would have + past participle を用います。表す内容:実現しなかった条件に対する過去の仮想結果。 この課題で完成する文は「Had the team ignored those records, it would have published images without the necessary permission.」です。