A critical review · B2. Identify the point that this example supports, without treating it as universal proof. Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event.
Read the original English material and answer with evidence. The level is an editorial guide, not a certified result.
Read the original English material and answer with evidence. The level is an editorial guide, not a certified result.
In the fictional documentary Borrowed Streets, filmmaker Leila North follows three residents during the redesign of a town square. A shopkeeper worries about deliveries, a cyclist wants safer crossings, and a teenager hopes for somewhere to sit without being expected to buy anything. The film is strongest when it allows these concerns to overlap. The shopkeeper, for example, also wants a safer route for her child. Such moments resist the easy division of residents into opposing camps. North’s camera stays close to individual experiences. We hear a delivery driver explain why a proposed loading area would add ten minutes to each stop, and we watch a wheelchair user attempt a temporary ramp. These scenes make the consequences of design decisions concrete. However, the film gives little information about how representative its participants are. It is possible to care deeply about their difficulties while still wanting to know what other residents think. The editing creates a further problem. A tense public meeting is followed immediately by a scene of construction work, encouraging the impression that objections were ignored. Only later does a caption reveal that six months separated the two events. The sequence is emotionally effective but leaves the decision-making process unclear. Access to that process would have strengthened the film’s central concern with public participation. Despite these weaknesses, Borrowed Streets avoids pretending that one design can satisfy everyone. Its ending shows a square that is more accessible in some respects and still inconvenient in others. Viewers seeking a technical guide to town planning will need additional sources. Those interested in how public spaces shape everyday dignity will find thoughtful material, provided they remain alert to the gaps between a compelling personal story and a complete account of a policy decision.
Identify the point that this example supports, without treating it as universal proof. Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event.
One successful repair shows that this item was repairable; it does not prove every item can be repaired.
Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
Use the whole text: a true detail is not automatically the main point. Separate supported claims from what the evidence leaves unknown. No mention does not prove absence.
The whole message is about a change of plan.
Read the original English material and answer with evidence. The level is an editorial guide, not a certified result.
In the fictional documentary Borrowed Streets, filmmaker Leila North follows three residents during the redesign of a town square. A shopkeeper worries about deliveries, a cyclist wants safer crossings, and a teenager hopes for somewhere to sit without being expected to buy anything. The film is strongest when it allows these concerns to overlap. The shopkeeper, for example, also wants a safer route for her child. Such moments resist the easy division of residents into opposing camps. North’s camera stays close to individual experiences. We hear a delivery driver explain why a proposed loading area would add ten minutes to each stop, and we watch a wheelchair user attempt a temporary ramp. These scenes make the consequences of design decisions concrete. However, the film gives little information about how representative its participants are. It is possible to care deeply about their difficulties while still wanting to know what other residents think. The editing creates a further problem. A tense public meeting is followed immediately by a scene of construction work, encouraging the impression that objections were ignored. Only later does a caption reveal that six months separated the two events. The sequence is emotionally effective but leaves the decision-making process unclear. Access to that process would have strengthened the film’s central concern with public participation. Despite these weaknesses, Borrowed Streets avoids pretending that one design can satisfy everyone. Its ending shows a square that is more accessible in some respects and still inconvenient in others. Viewers seeking a technical guide to town planning will need additional sources. Those interested in how public spaces shape everyday dignity will find thoughtful material, provided they remain alert to the gaps between a compelling personal story and a complete account of a policy decision.
A film that asks more than it answers
Identify the point that this example supports, without treating it as universal proof. Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event.
One successful repair shows that this item was repairable; it does not prove every item can be repaired.Use the whole text: a true detail is not automatically the main point. Separate supported claims from what the evidence leaves unknown. No mention does not prove absence.
The whole message is about a change of plan.Keep your first attempt, check the evidence and try another question. A follow-up on the same material does not prove transfer to a new text.
No practice notes yet. Try a short warm-up.
Identify the point that this example supports, without treating it as universal proof. Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event.
One successful repair shows that this item was repairable; it does not prove every item can be repaired.Keep the requested person, time, place or amount attached to the correct event.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.Use the whole text: a true detail is not automatically the main point. Separate supported claims from what the evidence leaves unknown. No mention does not prove absence.
The whole message is about a change of plan.Opening an answer records help for that question.
A film that asks more than it answers
The supported answer is “Residents’ interests can overlap across apparent divisions.”. Evidence: “Such moments resist the easy division of residents into opposing camps.”. Compare the alternative “A person’s business role determines their view on safer crossings.”. This reduces the argument to two opposing alternatives that the speaker or writer explicitly rejects. Compare the alternative “Having children should give residents greater authority in planning.”. This replaces the stated basis for judging a decision with a different criterion.
A film that asks more than it answers
The supported answer is “How representative they are of the wider community.”. Evidence: “little information about how representative its participants are.”. Compare the alternative “How each participant’s concerns affect daily use of the square.”. This describes information already supplied, whereas the question asks what was missing. Check the source wording “These scenes make the consequences of design decisions concrete.” against the question and the claim “How each participant’s concerns affect daily use of the square.”. Compare the alternative “Which competing concerns the film’s main participants express.”. This describes information already supplied, whereas the question asks what was missing. Check the source wording “A shopkeeper worries about deliveries, a cyclist wants safer crossings, and a teenager hopes for somewhere to sit without being expected to buy anything.” against the question and the claim “Which competing concerns the film’s main participants express.”.
A film that asks more than it answers
The supported answer is “Six months.”. Evidence: “six months separated the two events.”. Compare the alternative “Ten months.”. This attaches a real or plausible number, time or duration to the wrong event. Compare the alternative “Three months.”. This attaches a real or plausible number, time or duration to the wrong event.
A film that asks more than it answers
The supported answer is “The film is thoughtful but incomplete as a policy account.”. Evidence: “a compelling personal story and a complete account of a policy decision.”. Compare the alternative “The individual experiences provide a sufficiently complete account of planning policy.”. This claims more certainty or wider applicability than this evidence allows. Compare the alternative “The editing weaknesses outweigh any value in the residents’ stories.”. This treats a limitation as a reason to discard the whole contribution, rather than distinguish its use from its limits.
A film that asks more than it answers
The supported answer is “A wheelchair user attempting a temporary ramp.”. Evidence: “we watch a wheelchair user attempt a temporary ramp.”. Compare the alternative “A caption explaining how access affected the six-month timetable.”. This adds a specific detail that the account does not provide; plausibility is not textual evidence. Compare the alternative “A technical plan comparing alternative ramp gradients.”. This adds a specific detail that the account does not provide; plausibility is not textual evidence.
A film that asks more than it answers
The supported answer is “That construction followed immediately despite objections.”. Evidence: “encouraging the impression that objections were ignored.”. Compare the alternative “That the public meeting was held only after the square had reopened.”. This confuses two stages of the account: the initial situation and a later check or decision. Compare the alternative “That residents had no opportunity to raise objections at a public meeting.”. This extends a qualified finding into a claim without exceptions.
A film that asks more than it answers
The supported answer is “A viewer seeking a technical town-planning guide.”. Evidence: “Viewers seeking a technical guide to town planning will need additional sources.”. Compare the alternative “A viewer exploring how residents’ concerns overlap.”. These interests concern the personal experiences and everyday dignity the film already explores. The explicit need for additional sources concerns a technical town-planning guide. Compare the alternative “A viewer interested in the experiences of the people interviewed.”. These interests concern the personal experiences and everyday dignity the film already explores. The explicit need for additional sources concerns a technical town-planning guide.
A film that asks more than it answers
The supported answer is “The square improves some access while retaining inconveniences.”. Evidence: “more accessible in some respects and still inconvenient in others.”. Compare the alternative “The redesign removes the inconveniences described by the participants.”. This extends a qualified finding into a claim without exceptions. Compare the alternative “The remaining inconveniences mean access has not improved.”. This reverses the relationship stated in the passage.