Répondre à la consigne
Traite tous les points demandés en tenant compte du destinataire et du but. Le modèle est une possibilité, pas la seule bonne réponse.
The invitation states what, when and where, then asks for a reply.
B2
Une proposition formelle
À propos de cette leçon
Une proposition formelle · B2. Traite tous les points demandés en tenant compte du destinataire et du but. Le modèle est une possibilité, pas la seule bonne réponse.
Rédige ta réponse, puis compare-la au modèle et aux trois critères. Il s’agit d’une autoévaluation : aucune note automatique de justesse ni validation enseignante.
La rédaction se relit à l’aide des critères. Cette version n’attribue pas de note et ne certifie pas votre niveau.
2 questions
Retrouvez-le dans Ma collection après enregistrement.
Write an original response to each task. Use the model only after drafting your own text.
Quelques repères
Organiser le message
Présente les idées dans un ordre utile. Utilise des phrases et, selon la tâche, des paragraphes et des liens. N’ajoute pas de connecteur sans relation réelle.
I give the time first. Then I explain how to get there.
Vérifier la clarté et la langue
Vérifie verbes, accords, orthographe et ponctuation. Utilise des mots que tu comprends et clarifie les passages ambigus.
She works on Monday. We work on Tuesday.
Support de cours
Write an original response to each task. Use the model only after drafting your own text.
01 / 2P01Retrouvez-le dans Ma collection après enregistrement.
A small organisation has one shared room for calls, focused work and informal discussion. The manager requests a practical proposal. You may invent personal details; keep any facts supplied in this task.
Write 180–240 words. Identify the problem and users, recommend changes with reasons, discuss a constraint, propose evaluation and end with a clear recommendation.
Votre parcours
01
Étape 1 · Développer la compétence
0/1Répondre à la consigne
Traite tous les points demandés en tenant compte du destinataire et du but. Le modèle est une possibilité, pas la seule bonne réponse.
The invitation states what, when and where, then asks for a reply.02
Étape 2 · Développer la compétence
0/1Vérifier la clarté et la langue
Vérifie verbes, accords, orthographe et ponctuation. Utilise des mots que tu comprends et clarifie les passages ambigus.
She works on Monday. We work on Tuesday.Expression écrite
La rédaction se relit à l’aide des critères. Cette version n’attribue pas de note et ne certifie pas votre niveau.
Aucun texte enregistré pour le moment. Commence un exercice pour retrouver ton brouillon ici.
Carte de la leçon
B2Une proposition formelle
Points de la leçon
Répondre à la consigne
Traite tous les points demandés en tenant compte du destinataire et du but. Le modèle est une possibilité, pas la seule bonne réponse.
The invitation states what, when and where, then asks for a reply.Organiser le message
Présente les idées dans un ordre utile. Utilise des phrases et, selon la tâche, des paragraphes et des liens. N’ajoute pas de connecteur sans relation réelle.
I give the time first. Then I explain how to get there.Vérifier la clarté et la langue
Vérifie verbes, accords, orthographe et ponctuation. Utilise des mots que tu comprends et clarifie les passages ambigus.
She works on Monday. We work on Tuesday.Questions et réponses
Ouvrir une réponse enregistre une aide pour cette question.
A small organisation has one shared room for calls, focused work and informal discussion. The manager requests a practical proposal. You may invent personal details; keep any facts supplied in this task.
Write 180–240 words. Identify the problem and users, recommend changes with reasons, discuss a constraint, propose evaluation and end with a clear recommendation.
Réponse et explication
Proposal: Improving the shared work room
The shared room currently serves people making calls and colleagues who need sustained concentration. These activities can interrupt one another. I recommend a six-week trial that creates clearer expectations without requiring immediate building work.
First, we should reserve the window side for quiet tasks during two agreed periods each day. Calls and informal discussions could use the opposite end when necessary, but longer calls should move to a separate room if one is available. Clear signs and a shared calendar would make the arrangement easier to follow.
Second, we should provide a simple way to request adjustments. Staff with access needs or changing customer responsibilities may require flexibility. The policy should not assume that everyone can move at short notice.
The main constraint is limited space. Screens might reduce visual distraction, but we should test movable furniture before purchasing permanent fittings. Any changes must preserve safe routes through the room.
During the trial, staff could record whether a planned focus task was completed and describe any difficulties briefly. These notes should be considered alongside missed calls and meeting-room demand, rather than turned into individual performance scores.
I recommend beginning with the low-cost timetable and furniture changes, then reviewing the evidence after six weeks. Permanent spending should follow a demonstrated improvement, not precede it.
The shared room currently serves people making calls and colleagues who need sustained concentration. These activities can interrupt one another. I recommend a six-week trial that creates clearer expectations without requiring immediate building work.
First, we should reserve the window side for quiet tasks during two agreed periods each day. Calls and informal discussions could use the opposite end when necessary, but longer calls should move to a separate room if one is available. Clear signs and a shared calendar would make the arrangement easier to follow.
Second, we should provide a simple way to request adjustments. Staff with access needs or changing customer responsibilities may require flexibility. The policy should not assume that everyone can move at short notice.
The main constraint is limited space. Screens might reduce visual distraction, but we should test movable furniture before purchasing permanent fittings. Any changes must preserve safe routes through the room.
During the trial, staff could record whether a planned focus task was completed and describe any difficulties briefly. These notes should be considered alongside missed calls and meeting-room demand, rather than turned into individual performance scores.
I recommend beginning with the low-cost timetable and furniture changes, then reviewing the evidence after six weeks. Permanent spending should follow a demonstrated improvement, not precede it.
Un modèle possible, pas un corrigé unique. Autoévaluation: Le lecteur peut-il retrouver tous ces points : le problème et le public, des propositions pratiques justifiées, les ressources ou contraintes, une évaluation et une recommandation finale ? Organisation: Pars du problème et des usagers, puis présente actions justifiées, contraintes et évaluation ; termine par une recommandation réaliste. “First, we should” → “The main constraint is limited space.”. Langue: “I recommend a six-week trial that creates clearer expectations without requiring immediate building work.” La formulation exprime une position avec une condition ou limite ; une autre position bien étayée peut aussi convenir. D’autres formulations et structures peuvent convenir. Respecte les faits fournis. Il s’agit d’une autoévaluation, pas d’une note automatique de langue.
A community centre has an unused outdoor corner and a small volunteer team. The committee requests a proposal for a learning garden. You may invent personal details; keep any facts supplied in this task.
Write 180–240 words. Explain users and purpose, practical steps and reasons, resource limits, evaluation and a final recommendation.
Réponse et explication
Proposal: A small learning garden
The unused corner beside the community centre could become a place where residents learn basic growing skills. I recommend starting with two raised beds rather than redesigning the whole outdoor area immediately.
The first step should be an access and site check. We need to confirm permission to use the land, a reliable water supply and clear routes for people using mobility aids. Bed height and path width should be discussed with intended users before materials are purchased.
A small volunteer group could then choose a few easy crops and publish a weekly care list. Separate, manageable tasks would allow residents to contribute without promising attendance every weekend. Short demonstrations could connect the garden with existing cooking activities at the centre.
The main limit is volunteer time. A larger opening display might look impressive but become difficult to maintain during holidays. We should therefore reserve part of the budget for replacement materials and avoid promising year-round produce.
After one growing season, the committee should review maintenance records, participation and residents’ comments. The amount harvested would be useful information, but it should not be the only measure of a learning project.
I recommend a modest first season with clear responsibilities and a planned review. Expansion should depend on continuing capacity and user feedback, rather than enthusiasm at the launch alone.
The unused corner beside the community centre could become a place where residents learn basic growing skills. I recommend starting with two raised beds rather than redesigning the whole outdoor area immediately.
The first step should be an access and site check. We need to confirm permission to use the land, a reliable water supply and clear routes for people using mobility aids. Bed height and path width should be discussed with intended users before materials are purchased.
A small volunteer group could then choose a few easy crops and publish a weekly care list. Separate, manageable tasks would allow residents to contribute without promising attendance every weekend. Short demonstrations could connect the garden with existing cooking activities at the centre.
The main limit is volunteer time. A larger opening display might look impressive but become difficult to maintain during holidays. We should therefore reserve part of the budget for replacement materials and avoid promising year-round produce.
After one growing season, the committee should review maintenance records, participation and residents’ comments. The amount harvested would be useful information, but it should not be the only measure of a learning project.
I recommend a modest first season with clear responsibilities and a planned review. Expansion should depend on continuing capacity and user feedback, rather than enthusiasm at the launch alone.
Un modèle possible, pas un corrigé unique. Autoévaluation: Le lecteur peut-il retrouver tous ces points : le problème et le public, des propositions pratiques justifiées, les ressources ou contraintes, une évaluation et une recommandation finale ? Organisation: Pars du problème et des usagers, puis présente actions justifiées, contraintes et évaluation ; termine par une recommandation réaliste. “The first step should be” → “The main limit is volunteer time.”. Langue: “I recommend starting with two raised beds rather than redesigning the whole outdoor area immediately.” La formulation exprime une position avec une condition ou limite ; une autre position bien étayée peut aussi convenir. D’autres formulations et structures peuvent convenir. Respecte les faits fournis. Il s’agit d’une autoévaluation, pas d’une note automatique de langue.