과제 요구 충족
요구된 내용을 모두 다루고 독자와 목적에 맞게 쓰세요. 예시는 가능한 답안 중 하나이며 유일한 정답이 아닙니다.
The invitation states what, when and where, then asks for a reply.
B2
객관적인 보고서
단원 소개
객관적인 보고서 · B2. 요구된 내용을 모두 다루고 독자와 목적에 맞게 쓰세요. 예시는 가능한 답안 중 하나이며 유일한 정답이 아닙니다.
예시를 보기 전에 직접 글을 쓰세요. 과제별 점검 목록으로 검토하세요. 글을 자동으로 정답이나 오답으로 판정하지 않습니다.
쓰기는 직접 점검해요. 이 버전은 언어 점수를 매기거나 수준을 인증하지 않아요.
4 문항
저장하면 내 컬렉션에서 다시 볼 수 있어요.
Read each task, draft your own text, then compare the model and checklist. Models are not unique answer keys.
핵심 먼저 확인하기
글 구성하기
생각을 유용한 순서로 배열하세요. 필요에 따라 문장, 문단, 연결어를 쓰되 실제 관계가 없는 연결어는 넣지 마세요.
I give the time first. Then I explain how to get there.
명확성과 언어 점검
동사, 수 일치, 철자, 문장부호를 확인하세요. 뜻을 아는 단어를 쓰고 독자가 오해할 수 있는 부분을 고치세요.
She works on Monday. We work on Tuesday.
학습 자료
Read each task, draft your own text, then compare the model and checklist. Models are not unique answer keys.
01 / 4P01저장하면 내 컬렉션에서 다시 볼 수 있어요.
Fictional briefing: observe a library study area on three afternoons. Notes: 18 desks; all occupied twice; six users asked for sockets; quiet-room signs hard to see; groups and silent readers shared the same space.
Write a report of 180–220 words for the library manager. Present the observations, separate evidence from interpretation, identify limitations, and recommend two practical improvements.
학습 경로
01
단계 1 · 실력 다지기
0/2과제 요구 충족
요구된 내용을 모두 다루고 독자와 목적에 맞게 쓰세요. 예시는 가능한 답안 중 하나이며 유일한 정답이 아닙니다.
The invitation states what, when and where, then asks for a reply.02
단계 2 · 실력 다지기
0/1글 구성하기
생각을 유용한 순서로 배열하세요. 필요에 따라 문장, 문단, 연결어를 쓰되 실제 관계가 없는 연결어는 넣지 마세요.
I give the time first. Then I explain how to get there.03
단계 3 · 실력 다지기
0/1명확성과 언어 점검
동사, 수 일치, 철자, 문장부호를 확인하세요. 뜻을 아는 단어를 쓰고 독자가 오해할 수 있는 부분을 고치세요.
She works on Monday. We work on Tuesday.쓰기
쓰기는 직접 점검해요. 이 버전은 언어 점수를 매기거나 수준을 인증하지 않아요.
아직 저장된 글이 없습니다. 과제를 시작하면 초안이 여기에 표시됩니다.
학습 지도
B2객관적인 보고서
이번 단원 핵심
과제 요구 충족
요구된 내용을 모두 다루고 독자와 목적에 맞게 쓰세요. 예시는 가능한 답안 중 하나이며 유일한 정답이 아닙니다.
The invitation states what, when and where, then asks for a reply.글 구성하기
생각을 유용한 순서로 배열하세요. 필요에 따라 문장, 문단, 연결어를 쓰되 실제 관계가 없는 연결어는 넣지 마세요.
I give the time first. Then I explain how to get there.명확성과 언어 점검
동사, 수 일치, 철자, 문장부호를 확인하세요. 뜻을 아는 단어를 쓰고 독자가 오해할 수 있는 부분을 고치세요.
She works on Monday. We work on Tuesday.문제와 정답
정답을 열면 해당 문제에 도움 사용이 기록돼요.
Fictional briefing: observe a library study area on three afternoons. Notes: 18 desks; all occupied twice; six users asked for sockets; quiet-room signs hard to see; groups and silent readers shared the same space.
Write a report of 180–220 words for the library manager. Present the observations, separate evidence from interpretation, identify limitations, and recommend two practical improvements.
정답·해설 보기
Study Area Review
Purpose
This report summarises observations made in the library study area on three afternoons and suggests practical changes for consideration.
Findings
The area contains eighteen desks. All were occupied during two of the visits, and six users asked staff where they could find a power socket. The signs identifying the quiet room were difficult to notice. Groups discussing projects and people reading silently were using the same open space.
Interpretation and limits
These observations suggest possible pressure on seating and power access, but three afternoon visits cannot show how busy the library is throughout the week. They also do not establish how many visitors would use additional desks or whether existing sockets are always unavailable. The different study activities may create conflicting expectations, although no formal user survey results were supplied.
Recommendations
First, the library should make the quiet-room signs clearer and explain which spaces permit discussion. Second, staff should review socket locations and publish a simple guide before considering new electrical work. A short follow-up record covering different days and times would help the manager decide whether larger changes are justified.
Purpose
This report summarises observations made in the library study area on three afternoons and suggests practical changes for consideration.
Findings
The area contains eighteen desks. All were occupied during two of the visits, and six users asked staff where they could find a power socket. The signs identifying the quiet room were difficult to notice. Groups discussing projects and people reading silently were using the same open space.
Interpretation and limits
These observations suggest possible pressure on seating and power access, but three afternoon visits cannot show how busy the library is throughout the week. They also do not establish how many visitors would use additional desks or whether existing sockets are always unavailable. The different study activities may create conflicting expectations, although no formal user survey results were supplied.
Recommendations
First, the library should make the quiet-room signs clearer and explain which spaces permit discussion. Second, staff should review socket locations and publish a simple guide before considering new electrical work. A short follow-up record covering different days and times would help the manager decide whether larger changes are justified.
가능한 예시이며 유일한 정답은 아닙니다. 자기 점검: 독자가 필요한 내용을 모두 찾을 수 있나요: 관찰 내용, 해석의 한계, 두 제안? 구성: 기록된 사실, 신중한 해석, 한계, 권고를 소제목으로 구분합니다. 권고는 관찰 결과가 아니라 제안입니다. “Findings” → “Interpretation and limits”. 표현: “These observations suggest possible pressure on seating and power access, but three afternoon visits cannot show how busy the library is throughout the week.” 신중한 표현으로 기록이 보여 주는 사실과 가능한 해석을 구분합니다. 조사나 비율, 입증된 원인을 지어내지 마세요. 다른 표현과 구성도 과제를 충족할 수 있습니다. 제시된 사실은 유지하세요. 자동 언어 채점이 아니라 자기 점검입니다.
Fictional briefing: a college cafe trials reusable cups for one week. Notes: 90 drinks in reusable cups; 14 customers asked about cleaning; return box full twice; staff spent extra time explaining the system; total drinks sold was not recorded.
Write a report of 180–220 words. Summarise the trial, explain what the figures can and cannot show, identify operational issues, and recommend a next step.
정답·해설 보기
Reusable Cup Trial
Overview
The college cafe tested a reusable cup system for one week. This report reviews the available notes and identifies what should be checked before the scheme is extended.
Recorded results
Ninety drinks were served in reusable cups. Fourteen customers asked how the cups were cleaned, and the return box became full on two occasions. Staff also reported spending additional time explaining how customers should return their cups.
What the evidence means
The trial recorded reusable cup use, but the total number of drinks sold was not recorded. It is therefore impossible to calculate the proportion served in reusable cups or compare daily participation rates. Questions about cleaning suggest a need for clearer information, but they do not prove that customers were dissatisfied. The full return box may indicate a practical collection issue that needs checking, rather than a failure of the idea itself.
Recommended next step
A second short trial should record total drinks sold as well as reusable cup use. Clear cleaning information should be displayed, and staff should check the return box at agreed intervals. These modest changes would provide stronger evidence about participation while reducing avoidable demands on staff.
Overview
The college cafe tested a reusable cup system for one week. This report reviews the available notes and identifies what should be checked before the scheme is extended.
Recorded results
Ninety drinks were served in reusable cups. Fourteen customers asked how the cups were cleaned, and the return box became full on two occasions. Staff also reported spending additional time explaining how customers should return their cups.
What the evidence means
The trial recorded reusable cup use, but the total number of drinks sold was not recorded. It is therefore impossible to calculate the proportion served in reusable cups or compare daily participation rates. Questions about cleaning suggest a need for clearer information, but they do not prove that customers were dissatisfied. The full return box may indicate a practical collection issue that needs checking, rather than a failure of the idea itself.
Recommended next step
A second short trial should record total drinks sold as well as reusable cup use. Clear cleaning information should be displayed, and staff should check the return box at agreed intervals. These modest changes would provide stronger evidence about participation while reducing avoidable demands on staff.
가능한 예시이며 유일한 정답은 아닙니다. 자기 점검: 독자가 필요한 내용을 모두 찾을 수 있나요: 시범 결과, 자료의 한계, 운영 문제, 다음 단계? 구성: 기록된 사실, 신중한 해석, 한계, 권고를 소제목으로 구분합니다. 권고는 관찰 결과가 아니라 제안입니다. “Recorded results” → “What the evidence means”. 표현: “Questions about cleaning suggest a need for clearer information, but they do not prove that customers were dissatisfied.” 신중한 표현으로 기록이 보여 주는 사실과 가능한 해석을 구분합니다. 조사나 비율, 입증된 원인을 지어내지 마세요. 다른 표현과 구성도 과제를 충족할 수 있습니다. 제시된 사실은 유지하세요. 자동 언어 채점이 아니라 자기 점검입니다.
Fictional briefing: a museum tests a new audio guide with 12 volunteers. Notes: nine completed the route; three stopped because their phone battery was low; four found one instruction unclear; all testing occurred on a quiet weekday morning.
Write a report of 180–220 words for the museum team. State the results, distinguish device problems from guide problems, discuss the sample limits, and propose improvements.
정답·해설 보기
Audio Guide Test
Purpose and results
This report considers the museum’s trial of a new audio guide with twelve volunteers. Nine completed the route. The remaining three stopped because their phone batteries were low. Four volunteers also identified one instruction that they found unclear.
Problems to distinguish
The incomplete routes should not automatically be treated as failures of the guide content. Low batteries are a device-related barrier, although the museum may still need to help visitors prepare for using their own phones. By contrast, an unclear instruction is a content issue that the guide team can examine directly. The notes do not show whether the same volunteers experienced both problems.
Limitations
All testing took place on a quiet weekday morning. A small volunteer group may not reflect the range of visitors or the conditions of a busy weekend. These results cannot establish how the guide will work for every visitor.
Recommendations
The team should rewrite and retest the unclear instruction. It should also provide an advance reminder about phone batteries and explain any charging options available. A further test at a busier time, involving a wider range of visitors, would help assess whether these changes are sufficient.
Purpose and results
This report considers the museum’s trial of a new audio guide with twelve volunteers. Nine completed the route. The remaining three stopped because their phone batteries were low. Four volunteers also identified one instruction that they found unclear.
Problems to distinguish
The incomplete routes should not automatically be treated as failures of the guide content. Low batteries are a device-related barrier, although the museum may still need to help visitors prepare for using their own phones. By contrast, an unclear instruction is a content issue that the guide team can examine directly. The notes do not show whether the same volunteers experienced both problems.
Limitations
All testing took place on a quiet weekday morning. A small volunteer group may not reflect the range of visitors or the conditions of a busy weekend. These results cannot establish how the guide will work for every visitor.
Recommendations
The team should rewrite and retest the unclear instruction. It should also provide an advance reminder about phone batteries and explain any charging options available. A further test at a busier time, involving a wider range of visitors, would help assess whether these changes are sufficient.
가능한 예시이며 유일한 정답은 아닙니다. 자기 점검: 독자가 필요한 내용을 모두 찾을 수 있나요: 결과, 두 유형의 문제, 표본의 한계, 개선안? 구성: 기록된 사실, 신중한 해석, 한계, 권고를 소제목으로 구분합니다. 권고는 관찰 결과가 아니라 제안입니다. “Problems to distinguish” → “Limitations”. 표현: “The incomplete routes should not automatically be treated as failures of the guide content.” 신중한 표현으로 기록이 보여 주는 사실과 가능한 해석을 구분합니다. 조사나 비율, 입증된 원인을 지어내지 마세요. 다른 표현과 구성도 과제를 충족할 수 있습니다. 제시된 사실은 유지하세요. 자동 언어 채점이 아니라 자기 점검입니다.
Fictional briefing: a shared workplace tests online desk booking for two weeks. Notes: 30 staff used it; seven bookings were cancelled late; three people could not find their booked desk; there is no comparison with the previous system.
Write a report of 180–220 words. Present the facts, identify possible causes without claiming certainty, explain the missing comparison, and recommend practical adjustments.
정답·해설 보기
Desk Booking Pilot
Scope
This report summarises a two-week trial of online desk booking in the shared workplace. Thirty staff members used the system during this period.
Recorded difficulties
Seven bookings were cancelled late, and three people reported that they could not find the desks they had reserved. Late cancellations may have limited the opportunity for other staff to use those desks. Difficulty locating a desk could reflect unclear labels, an unfamiliar layout or confusing instructions, but the available notes do not identify a definite cause.
Limits of the findings
There is no comparable record from the previous system. The trial therefore cannot show whether online booking reduced confusion or improved desk availability overall. It also covers only a short period, during which staff may still have been learning how the system worked.
Suggested adjustments
The workplace should make desk labels easier to match with the booking screen and send a reminder explaining how to cancel promptly. Staff should also have a clear way to report a problem. A further trial should record the reasons for cancellations and compare desk use with an equivalent earlier period, where reliable information is available.
Scope
This report summarises a two-week trial of online desk booking in the shared workplace. Thirty staff members used the system during this period.
Recorded difficulties
Seven bookings were cancelled late, and three people reported that they could not find the desks they had reserved. Late cancellations may have limited the opportunity for other staff to use those desks. Difficulty locating a desk could reflect unclear labels, an unfamiliar layout or confusing instructions, but the available notes do not identify a definite cause.
Limits of the findings
There is no comparable record from the previous system. The trial therefore cannot show whether online booking reduced confusion or improved desk availability overall. It also covers only a short period, during which staff may still have been learning how the system worked.
Suggested adjustments
The workplace should make desk labels easier to match with the booking screen and send a reminder explaining how to cancel promptly. Staff should also have a clear way to report a problem. A further trial should record the reasons for cancellations and compare desk use with an equivalent earlier period, where reliable information is available.
가능한 예시이며 유일한 정답은 아닙니다. 자기 점검: 독자가 필요한 내용을 모두 찾을 수 있나요: 사실, 신중한 원인 추정, 비교 자료 부족, 개선안? 구성: 기록된 사실, 신중한 해석, 한계, 권고를 소제목으로 구분합니다. 권고는 관찰 결과가 아니라 제안입니다. “Recorded difficulties” → “Limits of the findings”. 표현: “Difficulty locating a desk could reflect unclear labels, an unfamiliar layout or confusing instructions, but the available notes do not identify a definite cause.” 신중한 표현으로 기록이 보여 주는 사실과 가능한 해석을 구분합니다. 조사나 비율, 입증된 원인을 지어내지 마세요. 다른 표현과 구성도 과제를 충족할 수 있습니다. 제시된 사실은 유지하세요. 자동 언어 채점이 아니라 자기 점검입니다.