Cumplir la tarea
Incluye todos los puntos y adapta el texto al lector y al propósito. El modelo es una posibilidad, no la única respuesta correcta.
The invitation states what, when and where, then asks for a reply.
B2
Un ensayo argumentativo
Sobre esta lección
Un ensayo argumentativo · B2. Incluye todos los puntos y adapta el texto al lector y al propósito. El modelo es una posibilidad, no la única respuesta correcta.
Escribe tu respuesta y después compárala con el modelo y los tres criterios. Es autoevaluación: no hay nota automática de corrección ni certificación docente.
La escritura se revisa por cuenta propia. Esta versión no da una nota lingüística ni certifica tu nivel.
2 preguntas
Guárdalo para encontrarlo en Mi colección.
EscrituraB2
Building a balanced argument
Escribe tu respuesta y después compárala con el modelo y los tres criterios. Es autoevaluación: no hay nota automática de corrección ni certificación docente.
Write an original response to each task. Use the model only after drafting your own text.
Un poco de claridad
Organizar el mensaje
Ordena las ideas de forma útil. Usa frases y, cuando haga falta, párrafos y enlaces. No añadas conectores sin una relación real.
I give the time first. Then I explain how to get there.
Revisar claridad y lengua
Revisa verbos, concordancia, ortografía y puntuación. Usa palabras que entiendas y aclara lo que el lector pueda interpretar mal.
She works on Monday. We work on Tuesday.
Material de aprendizaje
EscrituraB2
Building a balanced argument
Escribe tu respuesta y después compárala con el modelo y los tres criterios. Es autoevaluación: no hay nota automática de corrección ni certificación docente.
Write an original response to each task. Use the model only after drafting your own text.
01 / 2P01Guárdalo para encontrarlo en Mi colección.
An education forum asks: Should every adult course include an online option? Use hypothetical examples rather than invented research statistics.
Write 200–260 words. Present a clear position, develop reasons with examples, address a counterargument and reach a justified conclusion.
Tu ruta de aprendizaje
01
Paso 1 · Practicar la habilidad
0/1Cumplir la tarea
Incluye todos los puntos y adapta el texto al lector y al propósito. El modelo es una posibilidad, no la única respuesta correcta.
The invitation states what, when and where, then asks for a reply.02
Paso 2 · Practicar la habilidad
0/1Revisar claridad y lengua
Revisa verbos, concordancia, ortografía y puntuación. Usa palabras que entiendas y aclara lo que el lector pueda interpretar mal.
She works on Monday. We work on Tuesday.Escritura
La escritura se revisa por cuenta propia. Esta versión no da una nota lingüística ni certifica tu nivel.
Aún no has guardado ningún texto. Empieza una tarea y tu borrador aparecerá aquí.
Mapa de la lección
B2Un ensayo argumentativo
Puntos de la lección
Cumplir la tarea
Incluye todos los puntos y adapta el texto al lector y al propósito. El modelo es una posibilidad, no la única respuesta correcta.
The invitation states what, when and where, then asks for a reply.Organizar el mensaje
Ordena las ideas de forma útil. Usa frases y, cuando haga falta, párrafos y enlaces. No añadas conectores sin una relación real.
I give the time first. Then I explain how to get there.Revisar claridad y lengua
Revisa verbos, concordancia, ortografía y puntuación. Usa palabras que entiendas y aclara lo que el lector pueda interpretar mal.
She works on Monday. We work on Tuesday.Preguntas y respuestas
Abrir una respuesta registra ayuda para esa pregunta.
An education forum asks: Should every adult course include an online option? Use hypothetical examples rather than invented research statistics.
Write 200–260 words. Present a clear position, develop reasons with examples, address a counterargument and reach a justified conclusion.
Respuesta y explicación
Adult courses should normally offer some form of online participation, but a single model will not suit every subject. The aim should be meaningful access rather than simply placing a camera at the back of a classroom.
An online option can remove practical barriers. A learner who works changing shifts might watch an explanation later instead of abandoning the course. Someone with limited mobility may be able to participate without an exhausting journey. These benefits are especially valuable when the online material includes clear instructions and opportunities to ask questions.
However, access to a recording is not the same as access to learning. Practical courses may require equipment, supervision or interaction that is difficult to reproduce remotely. A beginner using unfamiliar tools, for example, may need immediate guidance. There is also a risk that online learners become a secondary audience whose questions are repeatedly overlooked.
For these reasons, requiring every lesson to operate in two formats could stretch a small teaching team too far. A better approach would combine reusable explanations with carefully chosen live sessions and suitable alternatives for practical work. Providers should tell learners clearly which parts require attendance before they enrol.
Online participation is therefore worth expanding, but its quality matters more than its mere availability. The strongest policy would support flexible routes while allowing course designers to explain justified limits. Offering a weak digital copy of every activity would create the appearance of inclusion without necessarily giving learners a fair chance to succeed.
An online option can remove practical barriers. A learner who works changing shifts might watch an explanation later instead of abandoning the course. Someone with limited mobility may be able to participate without an exhausting journey. These benefits are especially valuable when the online material includes clear instructions and opportunities to ask questions.
However, access to a recording is not the same as access to learning. Practical courses may require equipment, supervision or interaction that is difficult to reproduce remotely. A beginner using unfamiliar tools, for example, may need immediate guidance. There is also a risk that online learners become a secondary audience whose questions are repeatedly overlooked.
For these reasons, requiring every lesson to operate in two formats could stretch a small teaching team too far. A better approach would combine reusable explanations with carefully chosen live sessions and suitable alternatives for practical work. Providers should tell learners clearly which parts require attendance before they enrol.
Online participation is therefore worth expanding, but its quality matters more than its mere availability. The strongest policy would support flexible routes while allowing course designers to explain justified limits. Offering a weak digital copy of every activity would create the appearance of inclusion without necessarily giving learners a fair chance to succeed.
Un modelo posible, no una clave única. Autoevaluación: ¿Puede el lector localizar todos estos puntos: una postura definida, razones desarrolladas con ejemplos, un contraargumento justo con respuesta y una conclusión coherente? Organización: Desarrolla razones, una objeción justa y una respuesta en párrafos; la conclusión debe seguir el razonamiento. “An online option can remove practical barriers.” → “However, access to a recording”. Lengua: “Adult courses should normally offer some form of online participation, but a single model will not suit every subject.” La expresión presenta una postura con una condición o límite; otra postura bien razonada también puede cumplir la tarea. Otras palabras y estructuras pueden cumplir la tarea. Conserva los datos dados. Es autoevaluación, no una nota automática de lengua.
A local discussion asks: Should town centres replace some parking spaces with seating and trees? Use reasoned hypothetical examples, not fabricated local statistics. You may invent personal details; keep any facts supplied in this task.
Write 200–260 words. Argue a position, develop reasons, consider an opposing view and provide a balanced conclusion.
Respuesta y explicación
Replacing some town-centre parking with seating and trees can improve public space, provided that the change is selective and access needs are taken seriously. The question should be how the street serves people, rather than whether every parking space must either remain or disappear.
Seating gives people a reason to stay without buying something. Older residents may need a place to rest between errands, while families can benefit from a comfortable meeting point. Trees may also make a street more pleasant, although their maintenance and suitability for the location must be considered. A poorly planned planting scheme can create costs without delivering the expected benefit.
The strongest objection concerns access. Some visitors cannot easily walk from a distant car park, and businesses need reliable deliveries. Dismissing these concerns as resistance to change would be unfair. A proposal should preserve accessible spaces near important destinations and include realistic loading arrangements. It should also consider whether public transport is a workable alternative at the times people actually travel.
A limited trial could test the idea before permanent construction. Temporary seating would let residents and businesses describe specific advantages and difficulties. Evaluation should include who uses the space and who finds journeys harder, rather than relying only on attractive photographs.
I therefore support replacing selected spaces, not applying an identical rule to every street. A successful scheme would improve everyday use while responding to genuine disadvantages. That requires observation, adjustment and maintenance, not just an appealing drawing.
Seating gives people a reason to stay without buying something. Older residents may need a place to rest between errands, while families can benefit from a comfortable meeting point. Trees may also make a street more pleasant, although their maintenance and suitability for the location must be considered. A poorly planned planting scheme can create costs without delivering the expected benefit.
The strongest objection concerns access. Some visitors cannot easily walk from a distant car park, and businesses need reliable deliveries. Dismissing these concerns as resistance to change would be unfair. A proposal should preserve accessible spaces near important destinations and include realistic loading arrangements. It should also consider whether public transport is a workable alternative at the times people actually travel.
A limited trial could test the idea before permanent construction. Temporary seating would let residents and businesses describe specific advantages and difficulties. Evaluation should include who uses the space and who finds journeys harder, rather than relying only on attractive photographs.
I therefore support replacing selected spaces, not applying an identical rule to every street. A successful scheme would improve everyday use while responding to genuine disadvantages. That requires observation, adjustment and maintenance, not just an appealing drawing.
Un modelo posible, no una clave única. Autoevaluación: ¿Puede el lector localizar todos estos puntos: una postura definida, razones desarrolladas con ejemplos, un contraargumento justo con respuesta y una conclusión coherente? Organización: Desarrolla razones, una objeción justa y una respuesta en párrafos; la conclusión debe seguir el razonamiento. “Seating gives people a reason to stay” → “The strongest objection concerns access.”. Lengua: “Replacing some town-centre parking with seating and trees can improve public space, provided that the change is selective and access needs are taken seriously.” La expresión presenta una postura con una condición o límite; otra postura bien razonada también puede cumplir la tarea. Otras palabras y estructuras pueden cumplir la tarea. Conserva los datos dados. Es autoevaluación, no una nota automática de lengua.