Detalhes explícitos
Relacione a pessoa, horário, lugar ou quantidade ao acontecimento correto.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.
B2
Interpretar um teste de trabalho
Sobre esta lição
Interpretar um teste de trabalho · B2. Relacione a pessoa, horário, lugar ou quantidade ao acontecimento correto.
Leia o material original em inglês e responda com evidências. O nível é uma referência editorial, não um resultado certificado.
12 questões
Salve para encontrar em Minha coleção.
LeituraB2
Interpreting a work trial
Leia o material original em inglês e responda com evidências. O nível é uma referência editorial, não um resultado certificado.
This is a fictional workplace report created for reading practice.
Linden Services tested a revised working arrangement in its accounts and customer-support departments. For eight weeks, participating employees could work away from the office on two fixed days. The purpose was to explore whether a predictable schedule could combine uninterrupted work with reliable access to colleagues. It was not designed to compare every possible form of remote working.
Managers initially suggested allowing individuals to choose different days each week. Staff representatives objected that this would make it difficult to know when help was available in person. The final arrangement therefore used a shared timetable. Each team retained at least one experienced employee in the office every day, although the person covering that role rotated.
The report presents several kinds of evidence. Completed accounts work rose slightly during the trial, while customer response times remained broadly unchanged. However, these figures came from normal internal records, and no comparable department continued under the previous arrangement as a control group. A change in the amount or difficulty of incoming work could therefore have contributed to the results. The authors explicitly avoid claiming that the new schedule caused the increase in completed accounts work.
An anonymous questionnaire produced mostly favourable comments about concentration. Yet only employees who had participated completed it. Some staff had chosen not to join because their homes offered little private space. Their absence matters: a positive response from volunteers does not establish that the arrangement would suit the whole workforce. The report recommends asking non-participants about their needs before extending the scheme.
There were practical costs as well. New employees sometimes waited longer for informal advice, even though formal response targets were met. One supervisor suggested scheduled online question sessions. Another worried that making every question into an appointment would remove the spontaneous learning that happens when colleagues share a room. The authors propose testing a mentoring arrangement rather than assuming either suggestion is sufficient on its own.
The conclusion supports a longer, more carefully monitored pilot. It calls for records of work complexity, attention to new employees and a review of whether staff can access suitable equipment. Participation would remain optional during this next stage. The authors regard the initial results as a reason to investigate further, not as a final verdict on where everyone should work. A decision that affects different roles and home circumstances requires more than a single favourable average.
Um pouco de clareza
Razões · Detalhes explícitos
Use a razão apresentada; uma razão externa apenas plausível não basta. Relacione a pessoa, horário, lugar ou quantidade ao acontecimento correto.
We meet inside because it is raining.
Limites das evidências · Inferências a partir de pistas
Separe afirmações sustentadas do que permanece desconhecido. Não mencionar algo não prova sua ausência. Combine as pistas reais sem acrescentar fatos sem apoio.
The notice gives a price, but says nothing about delivery.
Material de estudo
LeituraB2
Interpreting a work trial
Leia o material original em inglês e responda com evidências. O nível é uma referência editorial, não um resultado certificado.
This is a fictional workplace report created for reading practice.
Linden Services tested a revised working arrangement in its accounts and customer-support departments. For eight weeks, participating employees could work away from the office on two fixed days. The purpose was to explore whether a predictable schedule could combine uninterrupted work with reliable access to colleagues. It was not designed to compare every possible form of remote working.
Managers initially suggested allowing individuals to choose different days each week. Staff representatives objected that this would make it difficult to know when help was available in person. The final arrangement therefore used a shared timetable. Each team retained at least one experienced employee in the office every day, although the person covering that role rotated.
The report presents several kinds of evidence. Completed accounts work rose slightly during the trial, while customer response times remained broadly unchanged. However, these figures came from normal internal records, and no comparable department continued under the previous arrangement as a control group. A change in the amount or difficulty of incoming work could therefore have contributed to the results. The authors explicitly avoid claiming that the new schedule caused the increase in completed accounts work.
An anonymous questionnaire produced mostly favourable comments about concentration. Yet only employees who had participated completed it. Some staff had chosen not to join because their homes offered little private space. Their absence matters: a positive response from volunteers does not establish that the arrangement would suit the whole workforce. The report recommends asking non-participants about their needs before extending the scheme.
There were practical costs as well. New employees sometimes waited longer for informal advice, even though formal response targets were met. One supervisor suggested scheduled online question sessions. Another worried that making every question into an appointment would remove the spontaneous learning that happens when colleagues share a room. The authors propose testing a mentoring arrangement rather than assuming either suggestion is sufficient on its own.
The conclusion supports a longer, more carefully monitored pilot. It calls for records of work complexity, attention to new employees and a review of whether staff can access suitable equipment. Participation would remain optional during this next stage. The authors regard the initial results as a reason to investigate further, not as a final verdict on where everyone should work. A decision that affects different roles and home circumstances requires more than a single favourable average.
01 / 12D01Salve para encontrar em Minha coleção.
Interpreting a work trial
What specific arrangement did the trial test?
Seu caminho de aprendizagem
01
Etapa 1 · Aquecimento
0/3Aquecimento
02
Etapa 2 · Praticar a habilidade
0/2Detalhes explícitos
Relacione a pessoa, horário, lugar ou quantidade ao acontecimento correto.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.03
Etapa 3 · Praticar a habilidade
0/1Limites das evidências · Inferências a partir de pistas
Separe afirmações sustentadas do que permanece desconhecido. Não mencionar algo não prova sua ausência. Combine as pistas reais sem acrescentar fatos sem apoio.
The notice gives a price, but says nothing about delivery.04
Etapa 4 · Praticar a habilidade
0/1Razões · Detalhes explícitos
Use a razão apresentada; uma razão externa apenas plausível não basta. Relacione a pessoa, horário, lugar ou quantidade ao acontecimento correto.
We meet inside because it is raining.05
Etapa 5 · Prática relacionada
0/3Prática relacionada
06
Etapa 6 · Desafio do texto
0/2Desafio do texto
Revisões desta unidade
0Transforme erros em aprendizado.
Mantenha a primeira resposta, confira a evidência e tente outra questão. Acertar no mesmo material não comprova transferência para outro texto.
Ainda não há revisões. Faça um aquecimento curto.
Mapa da aula
B2Interpretar um teste de trabalho
Pontos da aula
Detalhes explícitos
Relacione a pessoa, horário, lugar ou quantidade ao acontecimento correto.
The doors open at eight. The class starts at nine.Razões · Detalhes explícitos
Use a razão apresentada; uma razão externa apenas plausível não basta. Relacione a pessoa, horário, lugar ou quantidade ao acontecimento correto.
We meet inside because it is raining.Limites das evidências · Inferências a partir de pistas
Separe afirmações sustentadas do que permanece desconhecido. Não mencionar algo não prova sua ausência. Combine as pistas reais sem acrescentar fatos sem apoio.
The notice gives a price, but says nothing about delivery.Perguntas e respostas
Abrir uma resposta registra ajuda para essa questão.
Interpreting a work trial
What specific arrangement did the trial test?
- A temporary closure of the offices on the remote-working days.
- A comparison intended to identify the best model for all remote work.
- Completely unrestricted weekly choices for every employee.
- Two fixed remote-working days within a predictable schedule.
Resposta e explicação
Two fixed remote-working days within a predictable schedule.
A resposta sustentada é “Two fixed remote-working days within a predictable schedule.”. Evidência: “participating employees could work away from the office on two fixed days.”. Compare a alternativa “Completely unrestricted weekly choices for every employee.”. Isso confunde duas etapas: a situação inicial e uma verificação ou decisão posterior. Compare a alternativa “A temporary closure of the offices on the remote-working days.”. Isso acrescenta um detalhe que o relato não fornece; ser plausível não equivale a ter apoio no texto.
Interpreting a work trial
Why was the managers’ first suggestion changed?
- Employees preferred a trial without any fixed days.
- Staff representatives wanted to remove experienced employees’ office duties.
- Staff representatives thought changing days would make in-person help less predictable.
- Customer response data had already shown the shared timetable was ineffective.
Resposta e explicação
Staff representatives thought changing days would make in-person help less predictable.
A resposta sustentada é “Staff representatives thought changing days would make in-person help less predictable.”. Evidência: “Staff representatives objected that this would make it difficult to know when help was available in person.”. Compare a alternativa “Staff representatives wanted to remove experienced employees’ office duties.”. Isso atribui uma característica ou ação ao grupo ou falante errado. Compare a alternativa “Customer response data had already shown the shared timetable was ineffective.”. Isso confunde duas etapas: a situação inicial e uma verificação ou decisão posterior.
Interpreting a work trial
How was experienced office cover maintained?
- At least one experienced person remained each day, with the role rotating.
- The same supervisor stayed every day for eight weeks.
- New employees took turns providing the experienced office support.
- The experienced employees remained in the office throughout the trial.
Resposta e explicação
At least one experienced person remained each day, with the role rotating.
A resposta sustentada é “At least one experienced person remained each day, with the role rotating.”. Evidência: “Each team retained at least one experienced employee in the office every day, although the person covering that role rotated.”. Compare a alternativa “The experienced employees remained in the office throughout the trial.”. Isso transforma uma constatação limitada numa afirmação sem exceções. Compare a alternativa “New employees took turns providing the experienced office support.”. Isso atribui uma característica ou ação ao grupo ou falante errado.
Interpreting a work trial
Which reported measure rose slightly?
- The number of teams continuing under the original schedule.
- Completed accounts work.
- Customer response times.
- The share of the workforce reporting improved concentration.
Resposta e explicação
Completed accounts work.
A resposta sustentada é “Completed accounts work.”. Evidência: “Completed accounts work rose slightly during the trial”. Compare a alternativa “The share of the workforce reporting improved concentration.”. Isso troca o resultado medido ou relatado por outro diferente. Compare a alternativa “Customer response times.”. Isso inverte a relação apresentada no texto.
Interpreting a work trial
Whose views were missing from the questionnaire results?
- Employees who had not joined the trial.
- Supervisors responsible for organising the shared timetable.
- Participants who reported slower access to informal advice.
- People working in customer support rather than accounts.
Resposta e explicação
Employees who had not joined the trial.
A resposta sustentada é “Employees who had not joined the trial.”. Evidência: “only employees who had participated completed it.”. Compare a alternativa “People working in customer support rather than accounts.”. Isso transforma uma constatação limitada numa afirmação sem exceções. Compare a alternativa “Supervisors responsible for organising the shared timetable.”. Isso transforma uma constatação limitada numa afirmação sem exceções.
Interpreting a work trial
Why can the report not confidently attribute that rise to the schedule?
- The report had established that workload difficulty remained constant.
- There was no comparable control department and work demands might have changed.
- The questionnaire’s inclusion of non-participants distorted the work figures.
- The work data were collected only through participants’ opinions.
Resposta e explicação
There was no comparable control department and work demands might have changed.
A resposta sustentada é “There was no comparable control department and work demands might have changed.”. Evidência: “no comparable department continued under the previous arrangement as a control group. A change in the amount or difficulty of incoming work could therefore have contributed to the results.”. Compare a alternativa “The work data were collected only through participants’ opinions.”. Isso inverte a relação apresentada no texto. Compare a alternativa “The report had established that workload difficulty remained constant.”. Isso inverte a relação apresentada no texto.
Interpreting a work trial
Why does the report mention employees without private space at home?
- Their experience provides the strongest direct evidence of improved concentration.
- Their circumstances limit how far the volunteers’ positive feedback can be generalised.
- Their absence shows the scheme was unsuitable for any role.
- It establishes that home-working conditions caused the accounts increase.
Resposta e explicação
Their circumstances limit how far the volunteers’ positive feedback can be generalised.
A resposta sustentada é “Their circumstances limit how far the volunteers’ positive feedback can be generalised.”. Evidência: “Some staff had chosen not to join because their homes offered little private space. Their absence matters: a positive response from volunteers does not establish that the arrangement would suit the whole workforce.”. Compare a alternativa “Their experience provides the strongest direct evidence of improved concentration.”. Isso atribui uma característica ou ação ao grupo ou falante errado. Compare a alternativa “Their absence shows the scheme was unsuitable for any role.”. Isso inverte a relação apresentada no texto.
Interpreting a work trial
What difficulty did new employees sometimes experience?
- Formal customer-response targets were removed for employees at home.
- They had to provide the rotating experienced cover themselves.
- A longer wait for informal advice.
- Their formal requests routinely failed to meet the agreed response targets.
Resposta e explicação
A longer wait for informal advice.
A resposta sustentada é “A longer wait for informal advice.”. Evidência: “New employees sometimes waited longer for informal advice”. Compare a alternativa “Formal customer-response targets were removed for employees at home.”. Isso transforma uma constatação limitada numa afirmação sem exceções. Compare a alternativa “Their formal requests routinely failed to meet the agreed response targets.”. Isso inverte a relação apresentada no texto.
Interpreting a work trial
What concern was raised about scheduled question sessions?
- Scheduling questions would make meeting formal response targets impossible.
- The sessions would prevent experienced employees from rotating office duties.
- The sessions had been tested and found to solve the mentoring difficulty.
- They might not replace spontaneous learning between colleagues.
Resposta e explicação
They might not replace spontaneous learning between colleagues.
A resposta sustentada é “They might not replace spontaneous learning between colleagues.”. Evidência: “making every question into an appointment would remove the spontaneous learning that happens when colleagues share a room.”. Compare a alternativa “Scheduling questions would make meeting formal response targets impossible.”. Isso transforma uma constatação limitada numa afirmação sem exceções. Compare a alternativa “The sessions had been tested and found to solve the mentoring difficulty.”. Isso confunde duas etapas: a situação inicial e uma verificação ou decisão posterior.
Interpreting a work trial
What do the authors suggest testing in response?
- Waiting for response targets to fail before changing the support arrangements.
- Replacing face-to-face advice entirely with scheduled online questions.
- A compulsory timetable limited to employees who joined recently.
- A mentoring arrangement.
Resposta e explicação
A mentoring arrangement.
A resposta sustentada é “A mentoring arrangement.”. Evidência: “The authors propose testing a mentoring arrangement”. Compare a alternativa “A compulsory timetable limited to employees who joined recently.”. Isso elimina ou altera uma condição que limita a recomendação ou afirmação. Compare a alternativa “Replacing face-to-face advice entirely with scheduled online questions.”. Isso inverte a relação apresentada no texto.
Interpreting a work trial
What will happen to participation in the proposed next stage?
- It will become compulsory for every role.
- Employees without private home space will be required to join.
- Participation will be restricted to those who declined the first trial.
- It will remain optional.
Resposta e explicação
It will remain optional.
A resposta sustentada é “It will remain optional.”. Evidência: “Participation would remain optional during this next stage.”. Compare a alternativa “Employees without private home space will be required to join.”. Isso acrescenta um detalhe que o relato não fornece; ser plausível não equivale a ter apoio no texto. Compare a alternativa “Participation will be restricted to those who declined the first trial.”. Isso acrescenta um detalhe que o relato não fornece; ser plausível não equivale a ter apoio no texto.
Interpreting a work trial
Which interpretation matches the conclusion?
- The initial findings justify further investigation rather than a universal final decision.
- The lack of a control group makes the initial findings unhelpful for planning.
- The favourable average is sufficient grounds for permanent workforce-wide adoption.
- The results show that office location has no meaningful effect on any role.
Resposta e explicação
The initial findings justify further investigation rather than a universal final decision.
A resposta sustentada é “The initial findings justify further investigation rather than a universal final decision.”. Evidência: “a reason to investigate further, not as a final verdict on where everyone should work.”. Compare a alternativa “The lack of a control group makes the initial findings unhelpful for planning.”. Isso usa uma limitação para descartar toda a contribuição, em vez de separar sua utilidade de seus limites. Compare a alternativa “The favourable average is sufficient grounds for permanent workforce-wide adoption.”. Isso atribui à evidência mais certeza ou alcance do que ela permite.